Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tropical Storm Bonnie
NOAA/NHC ^ | May 28, 2016 | NOAA/NHC

Posted on 05/28/2016 1:47:51 PM PDT by NautiNurse

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Mears
“This superstorm is boasting killer winds of up to 40 MPH!”

We Shall Rebuild.

41 posted on 05/28/2016 5:27:58 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Oh,the humanity !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

.


42 posted on 05/28/2016 5:30:06 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

Naming storms so early IS BAD for citizens. Home owner insurance companies activate the hurricane deductible on coverage the minute the storm gets named. BAD BAD BAD


43 posted on 05/28/2016 6:16:29 PM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
Naming storms so early IS BAD for citizens.

I agree wholeheartedly, George.

On the other hand, naming marginal storms is good for government bureaucracies that depend on funding from Congress. Naming marginal storms is also good for those who promote the fraudulent Climate Change narrative.

44 posted on 05/29/2016 6:54:27 AM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
It's weird how T.S. Bonnie weakened as it approached the South Carolina coast. Or maybe not so weird. Last year's T.S. Ana officially dropped from 60 m.p.h. to 45 m.p.h. as it approached the South Carolina coast. I'm not aware of any land-based station that recorded tropical storm force winds.

Now why would the NHC consistently overestimate the windspeed of tropical systems by 10-15 m.p.h.? And wouldn't such overestimation lead to more and earlier named storms?

45 posted on 05/29/2016 7:09:01 AM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
While conspiracy theories are fun, they are not always based in fact. The warm Gulf Stream current was accurately predicted to strengthen this storm as it approached the U.S., while cooler waters closer to the continental shelf, wind shear and interaction with land were expected to weaken the storm.

There are no black helicopters in the grassy knoll for the storm system formerly known as TS Bonnie.

46 posted on 05/29/2016 7:36:43 AM PDT by NautiNurse (Obama sends U.S. Marines to pick up his dog & basketballs. Benghazi? Nope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
Home owner insurance companies activate the hurricane deductible on coverage the minute the storm gets named. BAD BAD BAD

Also--when there is a named storm lurking anywhere in the Atlantic, new insurance policies cannot be bound as required for closing a real estate sale.

47 posted on 05/29/2016 7:45:26 AM PDT by NautiNurse (Obama sends U.S. Marines to pick up his dog & basketballs. Benghazi? Nope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Looks like the Waffle House Index will be in full play this weekend.


48 posted on 05/29/2016 7:47:12 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Delegates So Far: Trump (1,239); Cruz (559); Rubio (165); Kasich (161)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Okay, Nauti, explain 2015's T.S. Bill. T.S. Bill reportedly struck Texas at peak intensity of 60 m.p.h. Since this happened in the western Gulf of Mexico, there can be no Gulf Stream claims. The Continental Shelf in the western Gulf goes out a long, long way. T.S. Bill "formed" over the Continental Shelf. No excuse there, either.

Although T.S. Bill made officially made landfall at 60 m.p.h., only one land-based station -- and automated station on a barrier island -- recorded tropical storm force winds and only of 40 m.p.h. (Interestingly, that one automated station on a Texas barrier island was the only U.S. land-based station to report tropical storm force winds in 2015.)

The NHC repeatedly reports windspeeds that are 10-15 m.p.h. over actually recorded windspeeds. In T.S. Bill's case, it was 20 m.p.h. over the actual speed. Do you really not see a pattern?

49 posted on 05/29/2016 7:57:44 AM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson