Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hello, Nihonium. Scientists Name 4 New Elements On The Periodic Table
NPR ^ | June 9, 2016 | Richard Gonzales

Posted on 06/09/2016 9:29:00 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: nickcarraway

Tenessine. Sounds like as disease. Compound Francium Tennesside sound like a murder witness.


21 posted on 06/10/2016 12:18:40 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrBambaLaMamba

Boatymcboatfacium should be next.


22 posted on 06/10/2016 12:53:42 AM PDT by sig226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
Can you imagine the alternative? LOL

"The periodic table should only contain elements that last an x amount of time, and that I learned about in my high school Chem class." LOLOL

23 posted on 06/10/2016 3:00:41 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: proust

“It is such a scam. They bring no value to world.”

I guess they bring no value to YOU.

Why do you presume to speak for the rest of the world?

These elements were only discovered within the last decade or so. It might be interesting to learn about some elements that were “useless” when they were discovered a couple of generations ago.

Related question: do smoke detectors also “bring no value to the world”?


24 posted on 06/10/2016 4:08:45 AM PDT by Jordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Element 126 might be stable:

Feynmanium and elements above the atomic number 137

Richard Feynman noted[7] that a simplistic interpretation of the relativistic Dirac equation runs into problems with electron orbitals at Z > 1/α ≈ 137 as described in the sections below, suggesting that neutral atoms cannot exist beyond untriseptium, and that a periodic table of elements based on electron orbitals therefore breaks down at this point. On the other hand, a more rigorous analysis calculates the limit to be Z ≈ 173.

25 posted on 06/10/2016 4:16:54 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Robert Lazar is fully vindicated, it seems.


26 posted on 06/10/2016 7:08:07 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slip18

Forget flash cards, you will remember the names better when they are set to music.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcS3NOQnsQM&sns=em


27 posted on 06/10/2016 7:08:34 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves. Socialism is governmental theft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jordo

The point made was that the new elements do not exist in Nature, and hold together only for a short time. They may only have use in weapons as transitional states, with no other use. All of the elements you mentioned “hang around” long enough to be useful. A smoke detector that is viable for 1ms really isn’t of much use.


28 posted on 06/10/2016 7:12:40 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
The Table should not include elements with existences measured in milliseconds.

In particle physics, a millisecond is an eternity. If you're talking about planck time, you'd have a better argument. That said, even though these elements exist for very short periods of time, you can learn how they behave and interact and it helps verify the physics models.

Even further beyond that is that once it is known how these elements will behave, new interactions with other elements may become possible that creates something very desirable.

To reject the existence of these things because they only exist in an accelerator or only existed in the first few femtoseconds of the universe is silly and shortsighted.

29 posted on 06/10/2016 7:18:28 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

Plutonium isn’t naturally occurring either. The difference between Boron and Carbon is a single proton, but the chemical properties are vast.

For now, these elements may only exist for milliseconds.

Who knows? Combine them in the right way and they may stick around.

It may also melt your face off, but don’t count science out because the process is messy. JJ Thompson discovered the electron. He also thought that because atoms are stable that electrons and protons existed in a sort of plum pudding, or a muffin-like thing where electrons and protons where sort of embedded together.

Wrong as hell on that account, but discovering the electron is why we love him.

Before Einstein proposed it, the idea of a bunch of north magnets all hanging out together closely packed together in the nucleus of an atom was absurd. That’s exactly what protons are, and what they do - happy to live very tightly packed in the nucleus. At the same time, electons (south magnets if you will) can only go two to an orbital.

One of these days all of this mishagas may lead to the graviton.


30 posted on 06/10/2016 7:19:21 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

“Unobtainium”

In my world all kinds of things are made from that now, it used to be rare but is now very common. ALL new cars are made from it now.


31 posted on 06/10/2016 11:46:21 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism, regardless of the race of the racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

“I’m waiting for 420 Doobium”

That would actually be Doobium 420 and you can make all you want with a few seeds and some dirt.


32 posted on 06/10/2016 11:48:25 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism, regardless of the race of the racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; nickcarraway

· String Theory Ping List ·
Periodic Table of Rejected Elements
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


33 posted on 06/10/2016 12:27:08 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Paging Tom Lerner...


34 posted on 06/10/2016 1:58:52 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I'j still upset that they didn't name element 100 Centurium.
35 posted on 06/10/2016 2:46:09 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Why are they messing with the Periodic Table? Leave the table alone! First they kicked out Pluto, I did not say because I was not pluto.


36 posted on 06/10/2016 3:16:55 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

And where is Rustoleum, you’d think that would be in there somewhere.


37 posted on 06/10/2016 11:12:55 PM PDT by Newtoidaho (Sprinkles are for winners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

Federalgrantium


38 posted on 06/12/2016 7:18:46 AM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
I had heard that song a few times. I love it. Now I have a place to find it😂. Thank you ever so much, Texas Republic!
39 posted on 06/18/2016 5:06:51 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson