Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Upholds Affirmative Action Program at University of Texas
New York Times ^ | June 23 2016 | Adam Liptak

Posted on 06/23/2016 7:26:00 AM PDT by Alter Kaker

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a challenge to a race-conscious admissions program at the University of Texas at Austin, handing supporters of affirmative action a major victory.

The vote was 4-3. Only seven justices participated in the decision, as Justice Elena Kagan had recused herself for prior work on the case as United States solicitor general and the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat remains vacant.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr, dissented.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: action; affirmative; affirmativeaction; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2016 7:26:00 AM PDT by Alter Kaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

ahh, Kennedy again.

The Borking of Robert Bork is the gift that just keeps on giving, and giving, and giving, and giving, and.....

Fat Teddy sure as hell knew what he was doing.


2 posted on 06/23/2016 7:27:48 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

The protected class(s) is very grateful.


3 posted on 06/23/2016 7:29:29 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Well, if it keeps Whitey down, then it’s a good thing! *SMIRK*

We’re So Screwed.


4 posted on 06/23/2016 7:30:21 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Enough. How many decades of this institutionalized racism must we endure? Inadvertently they are doing nothing but damaging minorities. When offered a choice one will pick the white because “they had to work harder to get it”.


5 posted on 06/23/2016 7:31:12 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Reverse discrimination a okay. Back at square one.


6 posted on 06/23/2016 7:31:54 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Black Privilege


7 posted on 06/23/2016 7:32:12 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

A selfish game for the Democrat party, really.

If it is of the government, it should be race blind. The place for focused do-gooding is in the private square, and that is on account of God, not on account of Uncle Sugar. If private parties want to pony up for scholarships for what they have a reason to believe are neglected minorities, let them do so and God will bless.

By the way since liberals are so transfixed on outcomes, they should look at the outcomes of AA programs. If counterproductive, they should judge their tree by its fruit.


8 posted on 06/23/2016 7:33:29 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Yep, Justice Kennedy again...the most dangerous-to-the-Republic Trojan Ass on the Supreme Court.

Leni

9 posted on 06/23/2016 7:33:51 AM PDT by MinuteGal ( GO, TRUMP, GO !!!....Plus....Boycott Target !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Or as might be said “if they shrank the baseball diamond when Hank Aaron stepped up to bat, would he be considered a sports great?”


10 posted on 06/23/2016 7:34:40 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Yep. Racism is perfectly okay as long as it’s against whites.

What a “supreme” court, huh?


11 posted on 06/23/2016 7:34:44 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

2A is next............


12 posted on 06/23/2016 7:35:59 AM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

affirmative action would be discriminatory if it only applied to white folks but white folks are excluded. How in the heck is that not discrimination?


13 posted on 06/23/2016 7:36:29 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Oh and this is just another reminder why Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz, and the rest of the GOPe are traitors to our country.


14 posted on 06/23/2016 7:37:24 AM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

Supremely full of itself, supremely out of touch.

The government does not have to be the countermeasure to every social ill; it is enough for it to resolve not to further the ill while also not creating the opposite ill.

Those who wanted the government to be their nanny will eventually discover that the nannyhood will go to places they never wanted it to go.


15 posted on 06/23/2016 7:37:57 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

I am fairly certain this is NOT what MLK had in mind.....nor the Founding Fathers.

In fact, any 2nd grader can see this is patently Unconstitutional.


16 posted on 06/23/2016 7:38:09 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Just as long as the “unequal rights based solely on race” is in the open. SCOTUS finds race-based discrimination to be constitutional.


17 posted on 06/23/2016 7:38:48 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

It’s a violation of the proper role of government. It is private parties, not governments, that God wants to step forward for the proverbial orphan and widow, inasmuch as they have special needs. And those private parties will have the sense that if they discover they are dealing with parricides and spouse killers, they won’t be so indulgent.


18 posted on 06/23/2016 7:39:46 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Universities and colleges are, by their very nature, discriminatory. For instance, I didn’t get into UNC because of my grades. So naturally, they have a lot of latitude on things like race and gender.


19 posted on 06/23/2016 7:40:49 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

And it belittles.


20 posted on 06/23/2016 7:40:57 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson