[pabianice]

[Gamecock]

** Why not tamper with the computers that manage the nation’s voting systems? **

And the seed has been planted.

[dartuser]

and Trump’s call for the Russians to expose Clinton’s deleted e-mails ...

Dems are sure in a tizzy about those yoga and wedding emails ...

[Trump20162020]

Meanwhile Communist China put out a big story against Trump, and are openly rooting for Clinton to win, but the media says nothing of that.

No wonder faith in these shills continues to decline among the American people.

[junta]

Mz Bray obviously on the JV squad, Diebold is off limits.

[marron]

If the computers can be tampered with, the DNC will do it this election. They do not intend to lose.

Trump, like most of us, assumes that both the Russians and the Chinese have already hacked her computers. They hacked State Department computers, and Pentagon computers, why would they not have hacked hers too?

[TigerClaws]

Russian didn’t write the emails.

Russia didn’t choose to have an insecure home brew server.

Hillary is the JV team.

[RichInOC]

None of this would be an issue if Madam Secretary had done her computer security right in the first place.

[Quickgun]

The Boston Glob..”apparent”. What evidence do they have it was the Russians?

[InterceptPoint]

Why not tamper with the computers that manage the nation’s voting systems?

Sorry, that job is already taken.

[VitacoreVision]

[BenLurkin]

Because we can’t hold free and fair elections if the voters know how crooked the Democrats really are.

[Stand Watch Listen]

Watch "Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/kypl1MYuKDY (19.46 min)

[ek_hornbeck]

I'm more concerned over the contents of the emails than who might be responsible for revealing them. It's a logical fallacy to "refute" accusations and evidence by focusing on the motives of those making and presenting them, but unfortunately, the media now has the public more focused on who hacked the server than on the servers' damning contents thanks to this fallacy.

You'll notice that the DNC has made no effort to refute the revealed dirty tricks, just as Hillary will make no effort to refute evidence of her wrongdoing when it's revealed. They won't because they can't, so the only alternative as ad hominems on the sources and their motives.

[Williams]

What a crock of bs. The real story is how sloppy and irresponsible the democrats are.

[Buckeye McFrog]

shows that the insecurity of America’s data networks could undermine our ability to hold free and fair elections.

Is the MSM now embracing the conspiracy theories about hackable Diebold voting machines?

[Kickass Conservative]

>>>Russia’s apparent election tampering<<<

Nice Urban Myth they have there. Clinton’s Campaign Manager makes something up out of thin air and now it’s fact.

Goebbels would be proud of his Charges.

[Crucial]

A storyline imagined by Hillary and the DNC no doubt.

[Eva]

The Democrats have already got the voting machines covered. Fast Eddie Rendell took care of that when he was head of the DNC. .

[eyeamok]

What the Hell are they talking about? Hillary’s emails are not and never have been a National Security issue, just chit chat with her family. I am confused, please help.

[Lisbon1940]

It was explained yesterday that this was a joke.