Posted on 08/10/2016 9:16:29 PM PDT by rickmichaels
Sounds like the personnel department needs to hang a pound of bacon on the door handle.
Are there any teetotaling Christian or Mormon flight attendants? Have any of them ever pressed this issue? I know that no Christian is as pure of body, mind, or spirit as your average Muslim, but I have to say this looks like a set up to make trouble.
Islam needs to be stopped at America’s border.
So..... what’s to stop Cankles from appointing a sharia muslim islamist jihadist to the Supreme Court?
Nothing.
They own her.
Not only was she rightly suspended she should never have been hired for that job in the first place. Employees don’t get to set company policy and good people couldn’t care less for her filthy, murderous religion.
So cheers, beyaatch!
Not me. Not us.
If it were my company everyone would be required to eat a bacon sandwich at the job interview.
... And if any country full of muslims messes with us we destroy them. That's the way this should work from here on out. You come here, You assimilate to our American culture or you get the hell out. You ain't bringing your goat fornicating ways here.
This lawsuit is absurd even under their "laws", let alone ours.
But Mr Hammere, are you saying that I can be ORDERED to serve someone when I am running my own company, but that it is OK for me to refuse to serve something I disagree with when I am accepting money from someone to work for their company?
Good Grief .. don’t these personnel offices know that you have to screen these people .. ask them if they have an issue about serving alcohol .. if they find out it’s a condition of employment; it might stop this type of reaction.
EEOC can’t stop an employer from asking if the person can do the job; and if there are parts of the job the person doesn’t want to do (for religious reasons) .. the employer has to decide how much of an accommodation will they be willing to make; and is it reasonable.
Being up front about it makes it easier for the employer and the employee to have a better relationship.
In this case, the employee is not being asked to DRINK the liquor .. just serve it to someone else. I would not consider this person’s request to not serve liquor as a reasonable request.
However, the only other answer is to place the person in another position where they would not have to serve liquor. However, it is probably a lower paying job.
Employer’s better know their EEOC laws .. it will keep them out of trouble.
"No, we don't need to know why you'd rather not serve bacon to the passengers.
Contrast with Christian businesses and the treatment they receive from that rat in Wasbington.
Stick her, Clock Boy and that Olympic bitch on a plane and fly them all out of the country.
You are correct sir. It appears that too many people think the constitution is a suicide pact.
The scum sucking dirt bag libtards, have violated the constitution again, which is something they do everyday, but the government is not supposed to establish a state religion. They have established Islam as their defacto favorite religion. It sucks, and I despise the libtards for that.
She should have been fired.
More evidence that hiring plague victims is preferable to hiring Muslims.
Since she's all down with the sharia thingee, why doesn't she move to ISIS-Syria? Teh Boyz don't want no likker - but they certainly want your body, dearheart...
If I was one of the passengers she refused to serve, then I would be countering with claim - not against the airline but against her personally.
If you can be sued for not baking one type of cake then you can be sued for not pouring one type of drink.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.