Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ: Hey, Iran Is Going To View This $400 Million Cash Payment As A Ransom
Townhall.com ^ | August 15, 2016 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 08/15/2016 10:46:49 AM PDT by Kaslin

The $400 million cash payment to the Iranians that coincided with the release of four detained Americans in January was met with objections by the Department of Justice. Why? Well, because it'll look like a ransom payment (via WSJ):

John Carlin, a Senate-confirmed administration appointee, raised concerns when the State Department notified Justice officials of its plan to deliver to Iran a planeful of cash, saying it would be viewed as a ransom payment, these people said. A number of other high-ranking Justice officials voiced similar concerns as the negotiations proceeded, they said.

The U.S. paid Iran $400 million in cash on Jan. 17 as part of a larger $1.7 billion settlement of a failed 1979 arms deal between the U.S. and Iran that was announced that day. Also on that day, Iran released four detained Americans in exchange for the U.S.’s releasing from prison—or dropping charges against—Iranians charged with violating sanctions laws. U.S. officials have said the swap was agreed upon in separate talks.

The objection of senior Justice Department officials was that Iranian officials were likely to view the $400 million payment as ransom, thereby undercutting a longstanding U.S. policy that the government doesn’t pay ransom for American hostages, these people said. The policy is based on a concern that paying ransom could encourage more Americans to become targets for hostage-takers.

But the president said that this isn’t a ransom, so we can just move on from this, right?  

Wrong. GOP senators are already asking questions about the internal dynamics of the transfer, asking Secretary of State John Kerry to offer more details. But Obama said that it was good that the U.S. and Iran had a dialogue over these prisoner exchanges while discussing the nuclear deal, the latter of which has been fraught with reports of the terror sponsor repeatedly skirting the provisions of the agreement. What do you expect from a state sponsor of terrorism that still props up Hezbollah and Syria’s Assad.

Over at Hot Air, Ed mentioned that perception is everything—and the DOJ knew how this would look to the public. He also said that the article undercut the whole notion that everyone was unified in this decision. Liberals, it’s okay to never engage your enemies. If Obama has shown anything with this strategy, it’s only ended in disaster on the big-ticket items: Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Iran.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: iran; ransom

1 posted on 08/15/2016 10:46:49 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

and a Surrender


2 posted on 08/15/2016 10:47:44 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why did it need to be converted to foreign currency if it was part of a payment in accordance with the agreement? Looks fishy because it is fishy.


3 posted on 08/15/2016 10:48:39 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

DoJ won’t do sh!t


4 posted on 08/15/2016 10:48:57 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What did Miss Loretta say?


5 posted on 08/15/2016 10:49:22 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Who knows how accurate, but keep hearing the intelligence community is beyond fed up with Hillary...have to wonder how much rank and file in the FBI and DOJ feel the same way.

Don’t know what they could do, other than leak and/or warn Trump about certain things.


6 posted on 08/15/2016 10:52:36 AM PDT by Crimson Elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

so Obama can unfreeze and send back the money ON HIS OWN ?


7 posted on 08/15/2016 10:57:09 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The most basic rules are dismissed by democrats. You don’t negotiate with terrorists, Lynch-Clinton meeting, etc.


8 posted on 08/15/2016 10:59:00 AM PDT by stillfree? (My My My)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"No! No, of course it wasn't ransom! [snicker]"


9 posted on 08/15/2016 10:59:52 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Donald Trump, warts and all, is not a public enemy. The Golems in the GOP are stasis and apathy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
Why did it need to be converted to foreign currency if it was part of a payment in accordance with the agreement? Looks fishy because it is fishy.

And how did congress appropriate the funds? What account did it get charged too? The president can't write checks.

10 posted on 08/15/2016 11:01:23 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Washington DC is nothing but a corrupt lying piece of stinking garbage. Nothing in Washington is worth saving.

Trump for President.

11 posted on 08/15/2016 11:02:38 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillfree?

No No, per the Just Us department we view it not as a ransom and never INTENDED to pay a ransom so no prosecution.


12 posted on 08/15/2016 11:08:16 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Full circle: under Hussein we’re back to paying tribute to mozlim pirates.

Having lost the protection of the British navy, we went from Articles of Confederation to a Constitution in order to build a navy to protect our merchant fleet.

Today, thanks to our federal gov. (doing everything but what it was intended to do) our navy can’t even protect itself.


13 posted on 08/15/2016 11:27:29 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
asking Secretary of State John Kerry to offer more details

Uh huh, sure.

14 posted on 08/15/2016 11:55:44 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But Obama said that it was good that the U.S. and Iran had a dialogue over these prisoner exchanges while discussing the nuclear deal...

By that logic, maybe we should just ship over some unsuspecting Americans, and we can have some more nifty 'dialog' with Iran.

15 posted on 08/15/2016 12:15:32 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: showme_the_Glory
You can guess what his details will be. This is a hint


16 posted on 08/15/2016 12:19:48 PM PDT by Kaslin (He neededAwesomeOf the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

fishy?

Hussein Obama, America’s FIRST Muslim President, worked hard to give Iran the resources to make Nuc Weapons. As a Muslim, Hussein feels confident that Iran will first use nuc weapons to kill Jews.

And there is hardly a Muslim on Earth that won’t rejoice when masses of Jews die in Israel.

By the time Iran bombs the US, Hussein won’t care. He will safely be living in a Muslim country of his choice.


17 posted on 08/15/2016 5:54:35 PM PDT by politicianslie (What would a terroristdo if he were made POTUS? ANS: Exactly what Hussein Obama is doing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Might as well have flown the pallet into Milwaukee.


18 posted on 08/16/2016 5:49:38 AM PDT by Religion and Politics (Let's get Trump to turn the Presidential persona on for a test ride from now to January.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson