Posted on 08/18/2016 10:01:43 AM PDT by detective
Shortened title.
Full title: Roger Stone: How Did Clinton Aide Huma Abedin Get Security Clearance, ‘Given Very Clear Ties to a Radical Offshoot of Islam?’
On Thursday’s Breitbart News Daily, SiriusXM host Alex Marlow asked guest Roger Stone about the Vogue interview with Hillary Clinton’s aide Huma Abedin, who said her Muslim faith helped her get through the sexting scandals of her husband, disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner.
“It’s an attempt, of course, to clean Huma up, and make her respectable, even sympathetic, for voters,” said Stone. “Vogue has been a great enabler and advocate for Hillary Clinton, which is ironic, in view of Hillary’s role in bullying, intimidating, and threatening the various women who have been her husband’s sexual assault victims. Are those the actions of a feminist, or an advocate for women? I think not.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Huma Abedin with her ties to groups that fund Muslim terrorists should not have security clearance.
Huma Abedin - Top Secret clearance
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-state-department-emails-reveal-clinton-aide-huma-abedin-failed-to-provide-financial-and-employment-information-as-required-by-law/
The records show that Abedin had a pre-approved Top Secret (Critical Sensitive) clearance for her special government employment position on March 20, 2012. The “revalidation” of her security clearance was directly tied to her pending SGE status. (The clearance document shows that Abedin’s original security clearance investigation and approval took place on the same day – February 4, 2009.)
On September 24, Judicial Watch released new records indicating that Abedin had failed to provide Weiner’s full financial disclosure records as required by law, despite repeated requests from State’s Human Resources and Financial Disclosures divisions. The records also indicate Clinton personally signed the authorization for Huma Abedin, her then-deputy chief of staff, to become a special government employee. The documents also raised questions about whether Abedin’s position complied with federal law that prevents special government positions created for work already performed by current employees.
Why? Because laws only apply to the schmucks, not to the demi-god, special, elite.
Special treatment for the Clintons and their buddies. To hell with national security when it comes to the Clintons (and the Dems for that matter)
Special treatment for the Clintons and their buddies. To hell with national security when it comes to the Clintons (and the Dems for that matter)
Nobody can blame Michell Bachmann.
She was sounding the alarm long, long ago, only to be demonized and ridiculed by the likes of John McCain and the President himself (no surprise there).
Most of the inside the Beltway crowd is culpable but for the record, Ms. Bachmann went to great lengths to question the security clearance for a number of shady characters.
How about Jeh Johnson. How about John Brenner. How about ....
If approval took place in 2009....then it ran out in 2014.
If Hillary does win, Abedin would have to go and reaccomplish the investigation, and the audit guy would come to this security violation business. I would be curious to see how any of them would sign off on stuff like this....out of fear of some Senator dragging them up to explain how they just over-look stuff.
That should be in a Trump ad. Huma should never have had security clearance when her relatives are in the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization. And after Hillary’s sloppy treatment of government secrets in Server Gate, why should she ever have security clearance again? Put that in a campaign ad and run it for at least a week on every channel.
Did they even do a bgc on her? I know mine took months to get done back in the day. Is her name missing from the “required training/breifing” as well. Oh, “I forgot!” The old steve martin line.
huma’s husband PULLS a lot of weight
When I was still a CI Agent, we could uncover the most heinous of information, but, in the end, if the commander said “yes”, the clearance was almost always granted. For civilians it was even easier.
I was being interviewed by an FBI agent concerning a colleague’s security clearance. After the interview I asked, “If I told you my mentor was Frank Marshal Davis and I had a well publicized relationship with Bill Ayers, would I qualify for a security clearance?” He looked very uncomfortable, because, if you are not aware, I was describing Barack Obama. Finally he said, “No.”
My takeaway is that politics trumps security. You or I would have gone to jail for what Hillary Clinton did. The rank and file FBI must be very embarrassed. I know I would.
We have to face it Hillary was or is sleeping with the enemy.
I think you are giving him too much credit.
Hillary Clinton: “clearance, we don’t need no stinking clearance.”
It appears that there was no background check. It also appears her hiring violated several government legal requirements.
But it was the Clintons who hired her.
Sheesh. How silly of me. I forgot for a nano second that “normal” rules do NOT apply to this bunch.
Giving Iran $150 BILLION SHOULD HAVE resulted in LONG prison sentences for many of our top officials.. 'SHOULD HAVE'. And the EMPTYING OF GITMO DURING A TIME OF HEIGHTENED TERROR AROUND THE WORLD IS BEYOND TREASON.
Notice Congress is silent through most of this? THEY KNOW they have been totally marginalized and are ALL forced into silence by the threat of the Islamic shadow gubmint network.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.