Posted on 09/01/2016 10:26:59 AM PDT by Weeble
Can Americans Overthrow The Evil That Rules Them?
Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Wolfowitz and the lies that he told in the high government positions that he held are responsible for a massive number of deaths and massive destruction in seven countries. Wolfowitz has announced his vote for Hillary Clinton. Does this make you feel reassured?
The real surprise would have been Wolfowitz’s announcement in favor of Donald Trump. So why was what was expected news?
Trump has said that he doesn’t see any future in the conflict Washington has initiated with Russia, and Trump questions the point of NATO’s continuing existence. These peaceful attitudes make Trump into a “national security risk” according to Wolfowitz. What Wolfowitz means is that a peace candidate is a threat to Wolfowitz’s doctrine of US world hegemony. In the crazed mind of Wolfowitz and the neoconservatives, America is not safe unless it rules the world.
Hillary is a warmonger, perhaps the ultimate and last one if she becomes president, as the combination of her hubris and incompetence is likely to result in World War 3. On July 3, 2015, Hillary declared: “I want the Iranians to know that if I’m president, we will attack Iran. . . . we would be able to totally obliterate them.” http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-if-im-president-we-will-attack-iran/5460484?print=1 The crazed Hillary went on from this to declare the President of Russia to be “the new Hitler.” Little doubt she thinks she can obliterate Russia also.
Hillary is the one who brought zionist neocon Victoria Nuland into the State Department to oversee the US coup in Ukraine in order to create more propaganda against Russia and force Washington’s European vassals to impose sanctions and place military bases on Russia’s borders, thus provoking a nuclear power and raising dangerous tensions.
This fits in perfectly with Wolfowitz’s intention. As Wolfowitz is Hillary’s likely Secretary of Defense, the two together mean World War 3.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, Wolfowitz, then a high Pentagon official, penned the Wolfowitz doctrine. The doctrine states that the principal goal of US foreign policy is to prevent the rise of other countries that could serve as constraints on US unilateralism. This means Russia and China, The combination of Hillary with Wolfowitz should scare everyone in the entire world. The prospect of nuclear weapons being in such crazed hands as those of Hillary and Wolfowitz is the most alarming though imaginable.
The question is whether Hillary can be elected in the face of her violations of national security rules, for which she received a pass from corrupt Obama, and her heavily documented self-dealings that have produced a Clinton private fortune of $120 million and $1,600 million in their foundation. It is completely clear that the Clintons use public office for their private aggrandizement. Is this what Americans want? Two people who become even more rich as the world is led into nuclear war?
But with electronic voting machines, the question will not be decided by what Amerians want, but by how the electronic machines are programmed to report the vote. The US has already had elections in which the exit polls, always a reliable indicator of the winner prior to the appearance of electronic voting machines, indicated a different winner than the electronic voting machines produced. The secrecy of how the voting machines are programmed is protected by “proprietary software.” The machines have no paper trails, precluding vote recounts.
As both political establishments are fiercely opposed to Trump, how do you think the machines will be programmed? Indeed, the media is so opposed to Trump, the question is whether there will be exit polls and if there are, will they be misreported?
Republican operatives, not Republican voters, are all in a huff over their allegations that Trump is costing the Republicans votes. How can this be when Republican voters chose Trump over other candidates? Aren’t the Republican operatives saying that they, instead of the voters, should choose the Republican candidate?
If so, they are just like the Democrats. Some years ago the Democrat establishment created “super delegates” who are not chosen by voters. Enough “super delegates” were created in order to give the Party establishment the ability to over-ride the voters choice of presidential candidate. That it was the Democrats—allegedly the party of the people—who first took the choice away from the people is astonishing. Much information indicates that Bernie Sanders actually won the Democratic presidential nomination but was denied it by vote fraud and “super delegates.”
This is politics in America—totally corrupt. Chris Hedges might be right: nothing can change without revolution.
The demonization of Trump by the presstitutes is proof that Trump, despite his wealth, is regarded by the Oligarchs who comprise the One Percent as a threat to their agendas. The Oligarchs, not Trump, own or control the media. So the presstitute demonization of Trump is complete proof that he is the candidate to elect. The oligarchs who oppress us hate Trump, so the oppressed American people should support Trump.
The presstitute demonization of Trump did not work in the Republican primaries. Is it working in the presidential election? We don’t know, because the polls are reported by the presstitutes, not by Trump.
If the demonization does not work, and the election has to be stolen from Trump by the electronic machines, the consequence will be to radicalize Americans, something long overdue. Perhaps the expectation of this development is the reason all federal agencies, even the post office and Social Security, have acquired arms and ammunition, and Cheney’s firm Halliburton was paid $385,000,000 to build detention centers in the US.
Those who control us are not going to give up their control without a world war. In the United States evil has seized power from the people, and evil will not give it back.
Writing is more disjointed than that of a high school sophomore on weed. Can’t go Wolfwitz or Hitlery.
Yes. The libertarian ideology is conceptually in agreement with DJT in many areas.
For example: Mr. Trump has said multiple times that “Bernie has it right” with respect to his take on Trade. Another example is government control of healthcare. Both camps do not want Obamacare or socialized medicine.
There are multiple areas of agreement upon which we can and MUST build, in the name of becoming One Nation again.
>>should DHS become somehow mandated or empowered to take over the election, it could be construed as sedition to challenge them in any way. Completely forgetting that it is black letter sedition for them to take it over in the first place.
*************************************************************
Exactly. I don’t understand why there isn’t furor over this point, except the recognition that we already live under Tyranny and fear the gov’t, which in and of itself, is the stunning reality about which many have yet to clearly understand.
There will be zero time to go to court because it will all happen at the last minute.
Even scarier is the other idea they floated in case one of the candidates died they could postpone the election.
At the risk of whatever, I see no exit from this inevitability other than immediately demanding maybe some Swiss or Swedish or Finnish election observers to handle the election. Of course this could never be done through the UN, then we would have Zimbabwean election observers.
I am completely serious about having foreign observers and the results cannot be allowed to be tabulated electronically. I mean, that ship has sailed.
I agree, it will happen at the last minute and it will be so stunning, there will be no time to react.
Like India under Gandhi.
<>Thomas Jefferson outlined the procedure rather nicely.<>
So did George Mason at the Federal Convention.
Its called Article V.
I share your concern and exploring possible solutions to mitigate the election fraud we are about to witness.
The logistics of working out foreigners monitoring our elections comes fraught with obstacles, on this short notice.
First, who would select the monitors? Who would stop the Feds from intimidating them? What oversight authority and power would come with their monitoring? It would all have to pass through Corruption Central, DHS/Feds, who have just power grabbed our “free elections” in a brand new way.
Yes, it will be last minute and STUNNING. You’ve nailed it.
Levin fights the Left on their own terms, in court. Teachers Unions hate him.
The DNC emails prove they stole the rat nomination from Sanders.
Yes, every executive agency is aligned to protect the Beast.
It stands to reason the same forces will do their best to steal the election.
Once that level of corruption is reached, when the last institution of the republic no longer serves its purpose, I wonder how many ostriches at FR will continue to put their faith in elections.
All in a day's work, for the propaganda machine.
Excellent links, Bogie. Thank you.
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.