Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Harvey: ‘It’s as Though the Clinton Campaign Held a Gun to the FBI Director’s Head’
Breitbart ^ | September 6, 2016 | John Hayward

Posted on 09/06/2016 10:45:03 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
It's actually worse than that.  It's as if they didn't have to.


FReepers, 100.00% of the Third Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.    Thanks to each and every one of you who helped.
...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

21 posted on 09/06/2016 11:48:29 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

22 posted on 09/06/2016 11:51:59 AM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot

*****Then when the GOP candidate gets elected, they can blackmail them.*****

Novel concept, however, in this immoral period of human history, nothing is off limits; “Rape, child molestation, abortion, sexual deviant behavior”. Which leaves only bribery, payola and greed as subject to blackmail.

Pray God, we wake up soon and again live by the Ten Commandments and His design.


23 posted on 09/06/2016 11:54:31 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Life is prickly - carry tweezers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Apparently knee pads are now standard issue at Quantico.


24 posted on 09/06/2016 12:03:06 PM PDT by Bruce Buckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Efrem Zimbalist Jr. is rolling over in his grave.


25 posted on 09/06/2016 12:16:12 PM PDT by Bratch ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
The Clintons make a point of getting dirt on people and if they can't find any they will indeed create it.....

I think Comfy went as far as he could in how he spoke to the American people...he did indeed let the facts be known as much as he could without putting himself in line for a jail sentence. Which the Clintons and Obamas would make certain he'd face. I actually think he told much more than they would have liked.

I was just listening to more of Hillary's rhetoric......it's very hard listening to her voice even when she tries not to sound like the witch that she is.....I can't for the life of me understand her supporters. But then it isn't about her as much as the party getting in itself...

26 posted on 09/06/2016 12:25:20 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Someone tells the Director, “you know, Hillary actually liked Vince Foster.”


27 posted on 09/06/2016 12:27:18 PM PDT by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

It’s actually worse than that. It’s as if they didn’t have to.
**************************

Bingo!


28 posted on 09/06/2016 1:14:04 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Can someone post the law that is being referred to here that he could have been charged with interfering with the election?

I would think that he would have some sort of immunity from prosecution. First off all he could do was recommend an indictment (which he famously declined to do), then it would have been up to the prosecutors to review the case and seek an indictment, before which they would have had to have the AG’s approval. And then it would have been up to the prosecutors to prove in court.

I just don’t see how gathering evidence, unless it was done fraudulently, would be cause to prosecute someone for interfering with an election.


29 posted on 09/06/2016 1:26:31 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
It is very simple...

... Plata o plomo. Tú decides....

30 posted on 09/06/2016 1:27:21 PM PDT by Gritty (This election is our last chance... We won't get another opportunity. It will be too late.-DJTrump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

“:^)


31 posted on 09/06/2016 1:40:39 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The reporter’s clearly never heard of Arkancide.


32 posted on 09/06/2016 1:49:29 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

Sorry, I don’t know. Ask one of the posters who brought it up.


33 posted on 09/06/2016 1:54:15 PM PDT by ETL (God PLEASE help America...Never Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

All this crap makes one wonder just what the hell they have onComey.
With Roberts, it was an illegal addoption.


34 posted on 09/06/2016 2:05:55 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (Go Trump, Give em hell BABY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

See #9


35 posted on 09/06/2016 2:09:17 PM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Maybe something involving minors? A double life? Or simple a hefty sum of money?


36 posted on 09/06/2016 2:12:25 PM PDT by Jane Austen (Neo-cons are Democrats who love war and illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: shotgun
Can someone post the law that is being referred to here that he could have been charged with interfering with the election?

I just don’t see how gathering evidence, unless it was done fraudulently, would be cause to prosecute someone for interfering with an election.

I agree. You don't charge the Director of the FBI with a crime for simply doing his job. He had the evidence. He laid it all out. He also had political cover - Barack appointed him and he had an excellent reputation (now gone forever.) There would have been backlashes from the die-hard Hillary supporters and the mainstream media but he swore an oath to the Constitution and he was duty bound to do his damn job. I think the man just wussed out. He laid out the evidence of her guilt and then said, "Well, I don't think any reasonable prosecutor would bring charges." That was NOT his job. His job was to examine the evidence, compile a report and deliver it to the DOJ with his evaluation as to Hillary's guilt or innocence. He's a wuss and he deserves all the shame and ridicule he's going to get for the rest of his life. He owed his country better. Shame on him.
37 posted on 09/06/2016 2:39:26 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The FBI and the DOJ are complicit in the felonious activities of Mrs. Clinton, her employees, and the Democrat Party. All involved could, and should, be indicted under the Rico statutes.


38 posted on 09/06/2016 6:27:23 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (Trump has terrified the world's criminal elite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen

love to see film of Billy and his doings on that jet and or on the island.
Come on Julian.


39 posted on 09/07/2016 3:34:29 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (Go Trump, Give em hell BABY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson