Posted on 09/18/2016 6:06:41 AM PDT by Kaslin
Much has been said and written about Edward J. Snowden, from bloggers to prize-winning journalists, from TV talking heads to the presidential candidates of both major parties. A diversity of opinion, sure, but the facts are not really in dispute.
As a former CIA employee and then Booz Allen Hamilton contractor, Snowden took classified material from the National Security Agency and gave it to journalists — thereby alerting Americans that their personal phone, email, social media and bank records were being illegally seized by the federal government.
Pulitzer prizes have been awarded to both The Washington Post and The Guardian of London for their reporting on NSA surveillance, reporting only made possible by the material Mr. Snowden risked all to hand-deliver to them.
On Friday, Oliver Stone’s movie Snowden opened in theaters across the country. If one hesitates to experience Stone’s sometimes fast-and-loose-with-the-facts sense of history, no problem: there are a number of excellent documentaries available, including the film Citizenfour, winner of the 2015 Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature.
Timed to the new movie’s release, the House Intelligence Committee released a 36-page report entitled, “Review of the Unauthorized Disclosures of Former National Security Agency Contractor Edward Snowden.” Unfortunately, the report is classified, so you and I can’t read it.
A three-page executive summary was released publicly — along with a news release quoting various congressmen on the committee, who argued that Edward Snowden is “not a patriot,” but, instead, “a traitor.” Barton Gellman, a senior fellow with the Century Foundation, called the report’s summary “aggressively dishonest.” Gellman, then at the Washington Post, was one of four journalists to receive classified materials from Snowden — in addition to The Guardian’sGlenn Greenwald and Ewen MacAskill and Citizenfour filmmaker Laura Poitras.
Last week, an effort was launched by the ACLU, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch to seek a presidential pardon from Barack Obama before he leaves office next January. The urgency of gaining a pardon from President Obama stems from the fact that neither Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump nor Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton are at all likely to pardon Snowden.
After all, Mrs. Clinton calls Snowden “a lawbreaker” and wants him to face charges. Mr. Trump says, “He’s a terrible guy,” and even hinted at seeking his execution.
Americans have been very divided on whether Snowden is a hero or a traitor, and accordingly, on whether he should be pardoned. A poll from a year ago found a plurality of 43 percent did not want him pardoned, while 33 percent favored a pardon.
Still, whatever one thinks of Mr. Snowden and his legal status, it seems strange that only one side of the illegality exposed has been addressed. One question, rightly, is whether Mr. Obama will pardon Snowden. But another legitimate question is whether Mr. Snowden and his fellow Americans, you and I included, will pardon President Obama.
Granted, no one has charged Obama with a crime.
And he never will be charged, most likely.
And yet, while no judicial determination has been made as to Snowden’s innocence or guilt, the judiciary has determined that Obama’s actions, in having his NSA gather our phone and internet metadata — and more — were illegal.
Snowden argues he was following a higher law: alerting the people to the illegal activity of their government. Obama violated that higher law: the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
“I welcome this debate,” Obama declared after Snowden broke the story of NSA surveillance. “And I think it’s healthy for our democracy. I think it’s a sign of maturity, because probably five years ago, six years ago, we might not have been having this debate.”
Obama’s U.S. Attorney at the time, Eric Holder, also applauded the debate Snowden sparked. Even the chief lawyer at the NSA acknowledged, “It’s certainly possible to think that increased public discourse about intelligence programs is a good thing.”
Of course, the debate would not have ever occurred if the public had no idea what both the Obama and Bush Administrations were up to. That disclosure, that transparency, came courtesy of Snowden — notwithstanding Obama’s silly statements to the contrary.
Some will never “pardon” or forgive Snowden, because he signed a contract to keep the government’s secrets and then broke his word. Yet, who among us, after making a similar pledge to accept a job and then discovering illegal activity in the work place, would put such a pledge ahead of doing what is right?
Last week, speaking from Russia (where the U.S. Government stranded him by canceling his passport) about the possibility of a pardon, Snowden said: “Yes, there are laws on the books that say one thing, but perhaps this is why the pardon power exists — for the exceptions, for the things that may seem unlawful in letters on a page but when we look at them morally, when we look at them ethically, and when we look at the results, it seems obvious that these were necessary things.”
If only Mr. Obama was as thoughtful in explaining himself and his administration’s unconstitutional actions, he might receive a pardon from civil libertarians . . . and from history.
And from Snowden.
Oh sure, that's at the top of everybody's list. Or even on it at all.
We will need to pardon H->!’s transgressions first.
Should America when 0bama is out of office??
Why not, he’s pardoning every one else?
Most of the the establishment’s venom and hate directed towards Snowden isn’t because he endangered US security.
It is because he revealed the damage the corrupt politicians and bureaucrats have done to the US Constitution and American citizens.
He showed the abuses and the corrupt hypocrisy of the government.
If they were truly concerned about exposing national secrets and damaging US security Hillary Clinton would be in prison right now.
+1
Snowden, Obama, and Clinton are all guilty of compromising our national security. Obama ran his mouth about the very men who took out Bin Laden, and; he even went to FT Campbell where the 160th plus the 5th Group is. He is a total IDIOT.
Snowden, Obama, and Clinton are all guilty of compromising our national security. Obama ran his mouth about the very men who took out Bin Laden, and; he even went to FT Campbell where the 160th plus the 5th Group is. He is a total IDIOT.
Wait -- if not for Snowden we wouldn't know WE THE PEOPLE were the target of NSA spying, NOT Moose-limbs. That guy deserves a medal.
It is because he revealed the damage the corrupt politicians and bureaucrats have done to the US Constitution and American citizens.
BINGO.
Snowden was just a spying confirmation that the gov’t and media couldn’t sweep back under the rug that lies on the floor.
Yes, Big-Time confirmation that Snowden exposed the entire NSA charade of diverting crucial intel resources FROM targeting Mooselimbs TO innocent (conservative) Americans.
Totally disagree as that program was also to weed out terrorists and inform of attacks. If you think AT&T, Verizon, T Mobile, plus every internet search engine don’t spy on you even more you are in left field. Snowden was interrogated by the Chinese and KGB. You had best believe we have had so much INFO hacked and even our collection techniques compromised by this treacherous punk.
I won't argue that, but I think Zero's actions are done in spite of the risk to security, maybe even because of the risk, where he is a Laser, painting the target.
He promised us change, now he is trying to follow through.
At least a sane informed comment!
Nationally, our techniques, codes, and military secrets are ALL hacked exactly because it is as intended by the Moose Limb in Chief and his minions since January 20, 2009.
America's security has been fully compromised purposely by The Regime for the entire EIGHT full years. Zero has ordered his Alphabet Agencies since Day One to leave the door wide open and be as sloppy as possible.
Who could have imagined a Sec of State (and private citizen) Hitlery would be allowed to have a private server with which to barter classified data and Top Secret info like currency to her seedy donors, foreign enemies, and anyone willing to "Pay-To-Play." What's Z's cut? Huma's?
NONE of these security leaks are surprises to 0bama, the Feebs, NSA, and every alphabet agency on the planet. THEY KNEW. They knew and regarded it as a Two-Fer -- weaken US security while selling us out. Those who knew were summarily fired or worse.
With respect to the spying on American citizens by the likes of AT&T, Verizon, T Mobile and most internet search engines like Google and Yahoo, yeah, no kidding. What's your point?
Let's not be naive; need I remind you that THE only reason they have this authority to monitor, steal, and rape our privacy to begin with is the pass along that harvested data.
The collusion of telecom companies as well as internet sites with the feral gummint isn't exactly kosher. Harvesting data and passing it along to the gummint is a blatant Constitutional violation, but it's permissible and perpetrated by The Regime under the flimsy auspices of "weed[ing] out terrorists and inform[ing] of attacks". Instead WE The People are considered "terrorists" whose collective opposition is regarded as "attacks."
With respect to Snowden, let's stop the hysterics. The man is a patriot, courageously sacrificed his life by adhering to principle as provided America with a great service and valuable insight into his employer: A rogue, treasonous regime.
If not for Snowden exposing this degree of disdain by our (supposed) own, WE The People would have never known that we are regarded by our rogue gummint as WE "THE Enemy."
If not for Snowden and the program to spy of us, who knows to what extent this charade would have progressed and to what end. Snowden is nothing but a scapegoat for a regime that's been selling, siphoning and hemorrhaging security secrets to the ChiComs and highest bidders (hello Russia, Saudis, etal.) for 8 years.
Which treacherous punk?
0bama, or Sickllary Clinton?
Snowden is a traitor same as the little queer Manning. Yes, Obama and Clinton have committed treason. Snowden, Manning, and Bergdahl have also. Next time you renew or shop for homeowners insurance look who provided the insurance company your INFO. It used to be Equifax. You will be surprised. Snowden damn sure set NSA back many years plus endangered INTEL folks lives. See what Mueller had to say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.