If you would like more information about what's happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me.
Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.
The reporter demonizing the weapons being used as 'assault rifles'.
The judge allowed this prejudicial video to be used as evidence in the trial.
Ammon Bundy was arrested unarmed and his wife said that Ammon never carried a gun during the protest.
The people who showed up in this video shooting could be the crazy, FBI informant, and or false flag operator types.
The defense is set to start making its case later in the week with Rev. Franklin Graham among its witnesses.
I’d be asking Mr. Knight if the FBI or any other agency examined the spent cases for fingerprints or DNA and if they identified anyone who handled them. Further I would ask if they did get prints or DNA that belonged to Ammon Bundy.
So firing a weapon is evidence of intent to harm for the FBI?
If so, they why isn’t a private email server evidence of intent to circumvent law? That’s far more obvious a crime, since law forbids government classified email from being outside a secure system.
On the other hand, the law permits firing rifles.
And .223 is not an assault rifle. It’s a repeating rifle that takes down varmints and predators like coyotes.
I don’t get it.
how I read this is the FBI has evidence that someone somewhere fired rifles.
I don’t understand why that’s even important.
All that is clear to me now is that the FBI is led by a criminal.
The “ONLY F*CKING SHELL CASING THAT MATTERS” is the one the FBI HRT shitbag picked up and put in his pocket, after shooting Lavoy Finicum.
They have smear and innuendo.
> The people who showed up in this video shooting could be the crazy, FBI informant, and or false flag operator types.
That’s right.
If you would like more information about what's happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me.
Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.
no. Direct evidence of force would be dead FBI agents. A situation I wouldn't cry over.
They could go to any gun range in America and “scoop up” .223 shell casings, or more likely steel 7.62 shells.
What does it prove? It proves that Americans were exercising their 2nd amendment rights.
“rapidly firing assault rifles” An assault rifle is capable of full auto fire. If the defendants had assault rifles, but no stamp from the Ministry of Infringing Upon the 2nd Amendment, His Royal Highness would charge them.
If they are not being charged, these were not assault rifles. More lies from the Lesters.
The BATF/Dept. of the Interior railroad continues. Why aren’t the LEOs who murdered Finicum being charged with manslaughter, like the Tulsa woman cop?
Want four more years of this statist BS? The nevertrumpers and their gal Hillary do.
The FBI planted them.
And young Victoria is lucky that Loon Horuichi is retired - he would have been smacking his lips at a chance to shooot HER through the head.
Force is not and should not be a legal problem. I have used "force" in that sense daily for a very long time - firing pistol, rifle, or usually both every day that I am not on vacation. Assuming these are serious shooters, intent to do harm would have irrefutable evidence: dead bodies. In the absence of such evidence, we can conclude that there was no intent to harm others and no crime.
As for an NRA card, I have one too, as do millions of law-abiding citizens. The people I worry about are the non-NRA members, especially thugs like Barack Hussein and his minions.