Why has not Congress voted on this? Or did the reps and the senators accept to hand over the Internet to the barbarians?
Where is the “US” Congress?
Protecting, arming, and defending al Qaeda and Iran,
every last stinking EXEMPT one.
It wasn’t broke. Why did obama need to fix it?
Congress has failed us if we cannot block this.
“Relax” - What the vampire says right before he bites.
And that REALLY is all you need to know.
.
global sales tax to fund the globalist government (UN)
The future of the internet:
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/09/29/second-internet-coming-soon-courtesy-blockchain/
Most have been bought and are compromised
Handing over control of the Internet is a big, big, BIG mistake.
Congress wants ObamaNet and Soros will LOVE IT
Well it was nice knowing you Internet and free speech . Tomorrow if the Texas lawsuit doesn’t stop Him Obama will give away control of the Internet to the Muslim (57 Muslim countries) controlled UN. Most countries in the world don’t hold our values of free speech. We the USA controlled the Internet now Obama wants to give it to the UN before Trump gets elected or to fix the election.
Google , facebook etc already censor. You think after 57, 57 Muslim countries put pressure on Google they won’t censor? think again
I’m not saying it’s going to happen tomorow but eventually it will , the timetable ? who knows? I’m sure Obama wanted to get this done before the election to fix it.
The texas lawsuit could stop it today or President Trump could find a way . those are our only hopes
How long before the UN Controlled Internet shuts down freee speech on the Internet ? eventually it will happen
This Obama Internet giveaway to the UN is the end of free speech on the Internet.
Sooner or later the 57 Muslim countries are going to take over free speech on the Internet.
Just one way they could do it is threaten search engines like google to put any website like frreerepublic etc that criticize Islam on a blacklist so that no one will be able to find any website that doesn’t conform to the koran (eventually). they could threaten to take away their domain name ,ip address etc.
This is just one way I one little guy can see they can do it. 57 Muslim countries have a lot of money (Saudi etc..) and engineers . I’m sure they will do this and more.
If this happens and Texas lawsuit or Trump doesn’t stop it free speech , freedom , the Internet are over. Islam will dominate the world.
Sure you can create rogue Internets etc. but that takes a lot of money ,expertise and trouble. Google and search engines is what most 99% of people want is convenience and we are busy working don’t have countless hours to devote to some rouge internet. 99% of speech wiil be controlled by dictatorships and Islam. Muslims will not tolerate any criticism of Islam and they are not beyond threatening search engines.. if your site ever criticizes Islam it will be invisible to 99% of search engines . Islam is a cult.
Most of the countries in the world are dictatorships and 57 are Islamic . we would just be 1 out of 200. 57 act as block controlled by Islam. if this happens eventually we are done
Goodbye free speech and Internet It was nice while it lasted. Obama and the media are doing this in secret like they did TPP. This is what Texas and AG Paxton say in their lawsuit:
http://www.houstonpress.com/news/paxton-seeks-to-save-internet-by-suing-feds-8816163
“Trusting authoritarian regimes to ensure the continued freedom of the internet is lunacy,” Attorney General Paxton said in a statement. “The president does not have the authority to simply give away America’s pioneering role in ensuring that the internet remains a place where free expression can flourish.”
In the lawsuit, Paxton offers up a few hypothetical scenarios that could go down if the judge doesn’t grant this injunction and United States oversight of ICANN ceases. For one, he proposes, what if ICANN simply does away with the .gov domain name, and states are left to use the basic .com domain, removing citizens’ trust in the webpage? Worse, he says, how can we be sure that advisers on the ICANN board who come from authoritative regimes will not invoke prior restraint, a form of censorship that could threaten Americans’ ability to say whatever they please on Internet forums?
Paxton asserts that if the feds are insistent on allowing the contract to expire, then they need to first ensure that limits are in place that would not allow ICANN to breach any First Amendment rights.