Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oh My: Is Hillary Planning to Put Loretta Lynch on The Supreme Court?
Townhall.com ^ | September 30, 2016 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 09/30/2016 12:09:09 PM PDT by jazusamo

Oh My: Is Hillary Planning to Put Loretta Lynch on The Supreme Court?

Earlier this year when President Obama was searching for late Justice Antonin Scalia's replacement on the Supreme Court, Attorney General Loretta Lynch was reportedly on his short list of potential nominees. During the process, in which it quickly became clear whoever was nominated would not get a vote in the Senate before the election, Lynch withdrew her name from selection.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch has asked not to be nominated to the Supreme Court, a Department of Justice spokeswoman said Tuesday.

"The Attorney General determined that the limitations inherent in the nomination process would curtail her effectiveness in her current role," DOJ spokeswoman Melanie Newman said in a statement.

But now with the election just 39 days away, the rumor mill is swirling with chatter Democrat Hillary Clinton is planning to consider Lynch for the Supreme Court should she win the White House.

There’s been some speculation that Loretta Lynch, the attorney general of the Department of Justice, could be on Mrs. Clinton’s short-list. Mrs. Clinton already floated the idea to The New York Times in July, that she would like Ms. Lynch to stay on and serve in her administration.

If Clinton were to nominate Lynch to the Supreme Court, it would only bolster accusations of corruption and would put the private, secret meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton on her private plane just days before the FBI announced a non-indictment over Hillary's email server in July, into a whole new perspective.

Supreme Court aside, if Clinton wins she is reportedly planning to keep Lynch as Attorney General.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016election; hillary; hillaryscotus; lynch; lynchscotus; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Goes to explaining Bill and Loretta's little meeting.
1 posted on 09/30/2016 12:09:09 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Clintons never forget a favor....wink wink nudge nudge nowutimean nowutimean?


2 posted on 09/30/2016 12:10:43 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

She’ll get filibustered. No way. No how.


3 posted on 09/30/2016 12:11:18 PM PDT by guido911 (Please ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The pieces sure fit...


4 posted on 09/30/2016 12:11:18 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Lynch needs to be “appointed” to a thorough waterboarding and a public hanging.


5 posted on 09/30/2016 12:11:58 PM PDT by Noumenon (We owe them nothing: not respect, not loyalty, not obedience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What about Eric Holder?

But, I’d admit, Loretta Lynch would be more likely, because she and Bill go back to when he appointed her as attorney for one of the Federal Districts in New York.


6 posted on 09/30/2016 12:12:04 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Possibly. Given the timing of the meeting, I suspect it had to do more with Killary’s nasty, illegal email scandal.


7 posted on 09/30/2016 12:13:09 PM PDT by upchuck (To paraphrase Yogi Berra, "No one goes to Trump rallies, you can't find a seat!" h/t Husker8877)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Minority female....not a single Pubbie will have the stones to vote no.


8 posted on 09/30/2016 12:13:47 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I can’t believe anyone is surprised by THAT


9 posted on 09/30/2016 12:14:57 PM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

She meets hitlary’s hatred of civil rights protected by the 2nd Amendment


10 posted on 09/30/2016 12:16:01 PM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Just another reminder of how critical this election really is...


11 posted on 09/30/2016 12:16:01 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Trump/Pence 2016! Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Probably - a hateful, lying conniving POS.


12 posted on 09/30/2016 12:16:21 PM PDT by ZULU (Where the HELL ARE PAUL RYAN AND MITCH MCCONNELL ?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guido911
She’ll get filibustered.

Not by the current spineless senate.

13 posted on 09/30/2016 12:16:23 PM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Katie. Get with the program. If you think this country will survive Hillary, much less, the Supreme Court, you are seriously trump-hate deluded


14 posted on 09/30/2016 12:19:11 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Her nominee would be Cheryl Mills. She is faithful to HILLARY! and ridiculously extremist, plus she is young.


15 posted on 09/30/2016 12:19:40 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Just don't call them weasels.


16 posted on 09/30/2016 12:21:22 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Not to mention immunity deals for all things Clintanoid!


17 posted on 09/30/2016 12:22:16 PM PDT by rod1 (CTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT; gaijin

18 posted on 09/30/2016 12:23:27 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If Hitlery wins the election, Loretta Lynch is going to be the very least of our problems. Consider this: Hitlery wants to change the demographics of the country to that of California. Why? In just about every state right now, Hitlery and Trump are running neck and neck. All except California where she is TWENTY points ahead of him - 52% to 32%. No Republican will ever win California again, it is completely change. So she is going to open that border wider than Obamas fat head allowing everybody on earth to storm it. She’s also going to import millions of her personally created “refugees” from the middle east. The United Nations (of all things) issued a report last January stating that anywhere from 10 to 30% of these Hillary/Obama created “refugees” could be radicalized. So think of the possibilities here - She imports 3 million we could end up having 900,000 terrorists in the USA. An entire army. Ask me if anyone will give a damn about the Supreme court when we have terror attacks and mass killings every single day that will make 911 look tiny by comparison. This - woman - CANNOT - win - this - election. She is going to get a huge amount of people killed.


19 posted on 09/30/2016 12:25:19 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (By His wounds we are healed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Right on! Weasel fit fits them all perfectly.


20 posted on 09/30/2016 12:26:00 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson