[DoodleDawg]

Seems a simple dna test could end this story - if BJ is not the papa.

It could, and it did. The Star did a DNA comparison in 1999 using blood samples from Williams and his mother, and the DNA results from Bill Clinton run as part of the Ken Starr investigation. There was no match.

[silverleaf]

And who certified the clinton DNA sample was really from BJ?
Cause if it was the Clintions would have ended this story

BJ just sent the kid $700 a month and bought him Christmas presents for most of his life out of the goodness of his heart

[silverleaf]

And who certified the clinton DNA sample was really from BJ?
Cause if it was the Clintions would have ended this story

BJ just sent the kid $700 a month and bought him Christmas presents for most of his life out of the goodness of his heart

[silverleaf]

And who certified the clinton DNA sample was really from BJ?
Cause if it was the Clintions would have ended this story

BJ just sent the kid $700 a month and bought him Christmas presents for most of his life out of the goodness of his heart

[hecticskeptic]

It could, and it did. The Star did a DNA comparison in 1999 using blood samples from Williams and his mother, and the DNA results from Bill Clinton run as part of the Ken Starr investigation.,/p>

I am highly skeptical of the Starr investigation results actually being Clinton's.... they could have used the actual results in their investigation and some other DNA was substituted after the fact for the reports etc and this may have been allowed on some privacy grounds.

[Stentor]

There is no real legally usable evidence either way.

NO DEFINITIVE DNA TEST EVER CONDUCTED ON 'CLINTON SON'