Skip to comments.
Claim: Hillary Revealed Classified 4 Minute Launch Window For Nukes at Debate- FALSE (Snopes)
Snopes ^
| 10-20-2016
| Kim Lacapria
Posted on 10/20/2016 8:40:53 PM PDT by brucedickinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: brucedickinson
Note the “expert” is NPR’s goto guy Joe Cirincione - lefty all the way for years.
21
posted on
10/20/2016 8:57:56 PM PDT
by
CreviceTool
(A Good Samaritan with a handgun saved my life...)
To: brucedickinson
Sure, the pentagon folks have no idea what’s classified and what isn’t.
No wait,...that’s Hillary. C is for Cookie, right, sweetie-pie?
22
posted on
10/20/2016 8:58:00 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: eastforker
Yeah, I see that now. I didn't watch the debate.
But as I said in my other response, you can't go talking about that stuff unless it is officially declassified.
23
posted on
10/20/2016 8:59:07 PM PDT
by
Lysandru
To: bigbob
It needs to be on a diet as bad as her.
24
posted on
10/20/2016 8:59:27 PM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(<<<<< he no longer IS my 'teddy bear'.)
To: Lysandru
What Hillary said and revealed to the world was that the time from launch order to actual missile launch is 4 minutes.
To: brucedickinson
If it was classified, how would they know? Do either of them have a security clearance or work for the Pentagon?
To: brucedickinson
And with that single claim, 'Snopes' has proven their unworthiness for a single iota of internet traffic.
F'n blind tools.
27
posted on
10/20/2016 9:05:09 PM PDT
by
tomkat
(si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: brucedickinson
28
posted on
10/20/2016 9:07:13 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: Pete from Shawnee Mission
As SOS, She would have had that information.
29
posted on
10/20/2016 9:07:20 PM PDT
by
eastforker
(The only time you can be satisfied is when your all Trump.)
To: brucedickinson
Hey, Snopes must be correct. I mean, Andrea Mitchelle thinks so. That’s good enough for me! And the FBI, why, they’d be all over it if it were true!
30
posted on
10/20/2016 9:09:07 PM PDT
by
Dogbert41
(All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
To: Rurudyne
Hillary Clinton is to honest what Spocks Brain is to great TV. LOL!
The Revolution is ON!
Vote Trump!
31
posted on
10/20/2016 9:10:33 PM PDT
by
sargon
(The Revolution is ON! Vote Trump!)
To: Rurudyne
32
posted on
10/20/2016 9:12:15 PM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
To: headstamp 2
33
posted on
10/20/2016 9:12:19 PM PDT
by
jonatron
(Land of the Free, Home of the Brave)
To: Bob
That is how it works in any household with cats
People serve cats, not the other way around
34
posted on
10/20/2016 9:17:14 PM PDT
by
arl295
To: Pete from Shawnee Mission
If it was classified, how would they know? Do either of them have a security clearance or work for the Pentagon? And not just a security clearance. Even if you have a clearance you can't just browse through everything at that level.
Snopes is good for looking up "Is that cat really that big?"
But anything dealing with politics they are complete left wing hacks.
(and the answers are no for the white cat and yes for the yellow one)
35
posted on
10/20/2016 9:17:59 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(If Muammar Gaddafi had donated to the Clinton Foundation he would still be alive and in power today.)
To: Dogbert41
Snopes is basing its article on a different proposition from what Hillary said. That a president has about 4 minutes following detecting a nuclear attack on us, to order retaliation. That is not what she said. Probably she had no idea what she said.
36
posted on
10/20/2016 9:18:01 PM PDT
by
Williams
(The (republican) party is over.)
To: brucedickinson
The cat is probably the one who does all the heavy lifting...
37
posted on
10/20/2016 9:19:31 PM PDT
by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: brucedickinson
Snopes is so far left you can’t even find them.
But no, there’s no bias there at all.
/sarc
38
posted on
10/20/2016 9:22:55 PM PDT
by
Deo volente
(Our Independence Day is at hand, and it arrives on November 8th.)
To: brucedickinson
They took less than 4 minutes to defend her with a lengthy article, on a subject different from what she said. Maybe they should handle our nuclear codes. The real takeaway is she screwed up the topic. Any president will retaliate if told a strike is on its way.
39
posted on
10/20/2016 9:23:09 PM PDT
by
Williams
(The (republican) party is over.)
To: brucedickinson
I have seen a pattern in how snopes gets a false rating on stuff they don’t want people to know is true. They find a version of the true story that was botched...that got some facts wrong or added parts that weren’t real. Then instead of rating the real story they rate the botched one as false.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson