Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump children's roles blur line between transition, company
AP via WSIL ^ | November 20, 2016 | Jonathan Lemire

Posted on 11/20/2016 7:00:49 PM PST by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: EveningStar

Chris Wallace, on Fox, was just banging away at Pence about this very subject.

“How can you defend Trump’s children running his company while he’s President? Won’t this be the sane thing as the Clinton Foundation? Won’t other countries want to invest in the Trump company for the possibility of getting a political favor? “

Chris Wallace is a scumbag.


21 posted on 11/20/2016 7:47:48 PM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

The same media who yawned at Michelle Obama’s $300,000 “community relations” job at a hospital are now in full scandal mode, as they always are during Republican administrations.


22 posted on 11/20/2016 7:53:35 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova

Not the same thing.

We have laws, checks and balances, ethical rules and safeguards against abuse of power.

Thankfully, running a private business in this country still isn’t a crime.

And its not like the Trump family is expecting or asking for special treatment.


23 posted on 11/20/2016 8:04:12 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Or the Clinton aides who had simultaneously paid positions with Department of State, the Clinton Foundation and often a third gig, too?


24 posted on 11/20/2016 8:07:14 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Let the SMEARS BEGIN!. Can always trust the “All Puke” news service to put out communist propaganda and Democrat Party/Soros/Podesta/Clinton propaganda and lies (but I’m being redundant here).

Glad to see that they are consistent in their output, like a bad case of diarrhea.


25 posted on 11/20/2016 11:12:28 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Please name me the/any prior President’s families that have been even 1/3 as accomplished as the Trump children.

Don’t include the JFK kids—One was eye candy & p-whipped or he might still be alive. The other is a political hack in a skirt.

So— IF you were to be named President Elect of the USA, would you turn to your kids for help & advice? NO? Well, maybe Trump raised some kinds of substance who would NEVER need adult coloring books & Play Doh to assuage their hurt feelings. Which kind of kid was been raised in much larger proportions in the USA in the past 40 years???


26 posted on 11/21/2016 5:28:57 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Funny how the ‘pension’ that Obama arranged for his MIL in the amount of $160,000 annually hasn’t gotten much daylight by the press.

She lived in the White House—had servants—had cleaning persons—had laundry persons—had help of all kinds in a regal setting & Obama titled her with ‘Caretaker’ of the children-—who were NOT babies when they got to the White House, either. Grandma also traveled all over the world on ‘vacation’ at no expense to her.

Sooo—a grandma who ‘took care’ of her 2 grandchildren in a posh setting & had all kinds of help gets a PENSION of $160,000 a year.

I worked from age 15 to age 66 & MY PENSION in the form of Security is $1129 a month-—and I am due to get a raise of $3 a month from Obama. A whole $36 a year....Guess all the accounting & bookkeeping I did for all those years doesn’t measure up to being a grandma & taking care of 2 grandchildren inside a building with servants.

IF she is already collecting social security of her own-—does the $160,000 pension put her into a tax paying position? How much taxes will she be paying on that money? Grifters-—every one of them.


27 posted on 11/21/2016 5:38:28 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I would imagine Trump is smart enough to realize that the BSM is going to have a daily fit no matter what he does, so why do anything?


28 posted on 11/21/2016 8:46:19 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

>> Please name me the/any prior President’s families that have been even 1/3 as accomplished as the Trump children <<

John Adams, Theodore Roosevelt and George H. W. Bush.


29 posted on 11/21/2016 9:01:59 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

>> I would imagine Trump is smart enough to realize that the BSM is going to have a daily fit no matter what he does, so why do anything? <<

Because even though the POTUS is to some extent “above the law” in terms of his asset ownership and business interests, his children might very easily run afoul (or at least “appear” to run afoul) of many regulations and laws, both state and federal, if they give the impression of playing upon WH connections in the course of their business transactions.

Moreover, even if the Justice Department never lays a hand on the Trump family, investigations and litigation by state attorneys general, by other local authorities and by civil litigators could eventually spell serious headaches for Ivanka, Jared, Don Jr. and Eric. Mr. Trump might be well-advised to spare his kids the potential legal jeopardies involved.


30 posted on 11/21/2016 9:16:26 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

I think if they limit the business to running existing facilities they will be fine. How much influence can someone have by playing a round of golf or staying a few nights?


31 posted on 11/21/2016 10:12:47 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Old “NEWS” and speculation.


32 posted on 11/21/2016 11:24:36 AM PST by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (VMFA 235 '69-'72 KMCAS <---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

>> I think if they limit the business to running existing facilities they will be fine <<

Maybe so. But what if they want to expand? Then, what kind of negotiations might occur? With what legal consequences? Appearance of conflicts of interest? Or even real conflicts of interest?

Or what if a foreign bank that has lent them money threatens to call the loan unless certain harsh conditions are met? That sorta thing could get into treacherous territory, like the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Not where they’d wanna be, IMHO.


33 posted on 11/21/2016 1:44:47 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson