UK Diplomat: I’ve Met the DNC Wikileaks Leaker and the Person Is an Insider – Not Russian

The Gateway Pundit ^ | 12/11/16 | Jim Hoft

[Enlightened1]

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two. And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.

The continued ability of the mainstream media to claim the leaks lost Clinton the election because of “Russia”, while still never acknowledging the truths the leaks reveal, is Kafkaesque.
I had a call from a Guardian journalist this afternoon. The astonishing result was that for three hours, an article was accessible through the Guardian front page which actually included the truth among the CIA hype:

The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations, while the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia. A second senior official cited by the Washington Post conceded that intelligence agencies did not have specific proof that the Kremlin was “directing” the hackers, who were said to be one step removed from the Russian government.

Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.”

“I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack;

[Enlightened1]

Well there's goes the Fake News media pathetically desperate "the Russians did it" narrative up in smoke.

[Fai Mao]

Thanks for posting this

[Just mythoughts]

Somebody tell Lord McCain... he is hunting for a leaker not a hacker.

[Izzy Dunne]

Well there's goes the Fake News media pathetically desperate "the Russians did it" narrative up in smoke.

Care to bet on that?

If ABCNNBCBS mentions this at all it will be "This is just more Russian disinformation ".

[Enlightened1]

My pleasure!

[Enlightened1]

Bingo!

[Enlightened1]

Probably correct.

[Doogle]

".....it's.... it's... Huma...I knew it"

[alloysteel]

“... if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC...”

If wishes were horses, then beggars might ride, if turnips were watches I’d have one at my side.

Lots of ifs in a row there. Herself was just a very bad candidate, but that is what political parties get when they depend on the “my turn” method of selection of candidates for elective office.

Perhaps the Republicans have given up on this method of selection altogether, but apparently the Democrats regard the current system to be their only alternative. For sure, they have not developed a “farm team” concept for training and grooming future candidates for office. Nobody on the bench except a few retreads and potential surrender monkeys, notable only because they are related to a former star.

Which is a pity. The Republicans shall only grow soft in the absence of any real rivalry.

[Travis McGee]

[Enlightened1]

LOL!

I like that!

[butterdezillion]

This former UK ambassador. Iceland’s interior minister. These are named sources within foreign governments who are willing to expose the Obama regime’s corrupt bureaucracy, used as pawns for the democrats’ political hit-jobs.

We already know from IRS-gate that the regime used the IRS for political purposes - to stop groups like True the Vote, which sought to protect the integrity of the elections. We know that DHS tried to breach GEorgia’s voter registration system.

Fast and Furious tells us that the regime would deliberately send untrackable forbidden weapons to Mexico and Central America to try to set up a political narrative in the US when those guns were used to kill innocent Central Americans. (That, by the way, is basically an act of war against other countries for domestic political purposes).

We know that Benghazi was used to arm Islamist terrorists with the aid of Turkey’s Erdogan...

This regime has potential leakers all over the globe who may now be willing to step forward and expose the crimes and acts of war that this regime has perpetrated, now that the regime who committed those crimes has been voted out in the USA.

[Enlightened1]

Great and its needs to come out immediately.

[usconservative]

Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.” “I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack;

Doesn't John McCain wish Craig Murray was a US Citizen so he could subpoena him to appear before the Senate and name the leaker.

You can bet the farm that the political establishment is desperate to know who the "leaker" is so they can shut him/her up. You can also bet the farm that the CIA would be more than happy to do the job.

It doesn't play into their "the Russians did it!" propaganda and the blatant ramp-up to war some in Congress want us to be in.

[bert]

Leakers are dime a dozen on the streets and alleys of San Francisco

[Travis McGee]

The real "fake news."

[Travis McGee]

[Travis McGee]

[Dog]

White hats respond

[Biggirl]

The CIA is making stuff up to create conflict with Russia.