Posted on 12/12/2016 3:52:59 AM PST by Enlightened1
As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two. And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.
The continued ability of the mainstream media to claim the leaks lost Clinton the election because of “Russia”, while still never acknowledging the truths the leaks reveal, is Kafkaesque.
I had a call from a Guardian journalist this afternoon. The astonishing result was that for three hours, an article was accessible through the Guardian front page which actually included the truth among the CIA hype:
The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations, while the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia. A second senior official cited by the Washington Post conceded that intelligence agencies did not have specific proof that the Kremlin was “directing” the hackers, who were said to be one step removed from the Russian government.
Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.”
“I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack;
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Of course they are, it’s all part of the plan to start a war.
And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.
I’m wondering if the powers that be will bring back CSI: Cyber. It was a pretty good TV show that certainly exposed the perils of being hacked, etc. I figured the Obama Admin put the kybosh on it as it was getting to close too the truth. Except it has been our Government spying on the citizens, not other evil people.
CIA...
The Clinton Information Agency?
“IF Hillary had not connived with the DNC...”
And IF my aunt had a penis she’d be my uncle.
Fantastic, fantastic post..!
If our suspicions about Seth Rich are correct the libtards KNOW who did it....
“... if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC...”
“If wishes were horses, then beggars might ride, if turnips were watches I’d have one at my side.”
************************************************************
If the Queen had balls, she’d be the King.
The insider leaker who gave this info to Wikileaks needs to come forward in order to stave off a civil war. I’m certain that our President Elect will assure his future safety.
My forensic interpretation of these pronoun gymnastics by an educated Brit is that the leaker was female. Otherwise, you would say he, because you would just assume that the hacker was a he, and most people are looking for a he. But it's a she and to put the searchers off the sent you use a they instead of a she.
Well gee. I wonder why the dude's being so vague on this point.
"What mean, "weird and troubling", kimo-sabe? All the time talk about pizza?"
I believe the NSA knows every thing concerning who leaked what
I believe they know what’s on Assanges’ computer. Finally, I don’t believe the emails affected the election.
“...IF Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie
“IF she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie,
“IF she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence
“IF she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”
There are SO many “IFs” in this scenario that caused Hillary to lose, and I’ll add a few more:
IF she had not called people “deplorable and irredeemable”,
IF she had not said that Catholicism is a “bastardization of the faith”
IF her campaign hadn’t said that Catholics are bad, but at least they’re better than Evangelicals...
IF, when she had a choice to align with the police or Black Lives Matter, she chose BLM...
IF she hadn’t promised to put the coal miners out of work...
IF she hadn’t harassed a 12-year-old rape victim on the stand, blamed the little girl for the rape, “got off” the rapist via tweaking evidence, and laughed about the whole thing...
IF she hadn’t colluded with professional agitators to pay losers $1500 to stage violent protests in order to blame them on Trump...
IF IF IF
““I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack;”
Keep an eye on this guy:
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=222852653&privcapId=40152409
Justin G Cooper
Perfectly positioned to be in the know.
And they refer to this group of misfits as the “intelligence” agency?
A good place for Trump to start draining the swamp.
This article is much the same information that I have posted on several threads. I’ll just add that Judge Napolitano stated that it was the NSA that leaked the info to Wiki Leaks. Hillary’s private server and lack of security resulted in classified info being obtained by enemies.
Undercover operatives were exposed and some did not escape alive. They did not want her to be President. Revenge and Self preservation are powerful motives.
Assange also discussed the death of Seth Rich. He waltzed around the question of whether that was one of his sources, merely indicating that Wiki Leaks was always interested in finding out information-can’t remember exactly how he phrased it.
I’ll just note once again that Jesse Jackson rushed out to tell Obama to pardon Hillary, so whatever was revealed, he knows it to be true, else he would have denied the charges. Therefore, the electors should vote for Trump instead of a criminal that even her supporters feel is guilty.
So the question I ask is shouldn’t the American public be informed of true information before the election? Don’t we always have an October surprise? Shouldn’t all candidates expect that any and all sins are likely to come out and be prepared to answer the charges?
Shouldn’t candidates quit sinning and just be honest with integrity? If they can’t do that, shouldn’t they at least use secure systems, and quit plotting dirty tricks in emails sent over insecure systems?
Finally, I’ll just note for the record that “Fake News” is always and has always been around. Super market tabloids have been for sale ever since I can remember. TV “news” has morphed into an even bigger form of tabloid journalism with the advent of Hard Copy and the 24 hr news channels. People just have to sort their way through it, and the internet is no different. Censorship is absolutely forbidden. If something is false, the purveyor can always be sued.
And let’s not forget that the real “Fake News” was a Government instituted program involving major “news” outlets such as the Washington Post with the implementation of the Mockingbird Operation. Of course the Government told us that this all went away - and they wouldn’t lie would they?
After more than 50 years of reading and listening to news, I don’t believe a thing they have to say without further research.
I had a history teacher that told us one time- The best way to be informed is from many sources-and know what their bias is. That is why I read stuff from all over the world and why I read articles and comments here.
They could have the insider, Putin and Assange giving a presser in the Rose Garden and it wouldn’t make a difference in the msm meme.
If CNN doesn’t report it, it didn’t happen.
After more than 50 years of reading and listening to news, I don’t believe a thing they have to say without further research.
I had a history teacher that told us one time- The best way to be informed is from many sources-and know what their bias is. That is why I read stuff from all over the world and why I read articles and comments here.
Amen to all that. Be especially circumspect if the report is based on "anonymous sources", particularly if those sources are linked to left wing groups of any kind.
Headline of the Day Poll
Why are Democrats saying Russia interferred with the presidential election?
They are concerned with the integrity of the system
They are trying to delegitimize Trump’s presidency
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.