Replies

I’m sick of Arpaio et al. with this crap. Either put up or shut up! It’s long past time for them to have released their findings.

With all due respect, I don't really agree with that.

The real story of Barry is so complex and such an incredible tale that it is very difficult for even an informed investigator to keep track of all the loose ends long enough to understand and get through to the story of what really happened.

The ultimate proof requires you to reach an original hospital birth file, with the original footprints; get them read out. Then get a sample with which to compare that you can identify to the guy sitting in the White House.

There is some reason to be uncertain about exactly who the guy sitting in the White House is, as compared to the guy who went to Indonesia in January or February of 1963. So you need to get to enough facts so that you can prove the identity through several steps to get to 2000 when he started running for office.

All a difficult complex task.

Probably getting to the issue of the purported birth documents was achievable and you can reasonably expect Arpaio and Mike Zullo to demonstrate that there is no documentary evidence of any nature anywhere that proves he was born in Hawaii--or much of anywhere else for that matter.

Arpaio took this on because he thought it was pretty obvious that Barry was a fraud. Just a lot more difficult to prove all the elements than he expected. He was facing a determined, well financed, organized and supported adversary that spent something like $10mm before January 2009 and unknown public funds subsequently to prevent you from getting through to the real facts.

We are now entering conditions in which maybe we have a better access to proving enough of the facts to get to the real story.

Probably doesn't help to be too critical of the man working on the project though. Nothing is difficult for the man who does not have to do the work.

Thank you a thousand times, and to everyone who helped even a tiny bit.

Pinging, - begin at # 62 , or # 64 , and read to end of page .

.

The ultimate proof requires you to reach an original hospital birth file, with the original footprints; get them read out. Then get a sample with which to compare that you can identify to the guy sitting in the White House.

Assumption not in evidence. That there exists an original birth file that can somehow be matched to Baracck Hussein Obama. My guess is that everything we’ve been told is a lie. Blood samples of Obama, his half brothers, and any Dunham relatives would tell a phenotype story, which if samplers and testers are honest, would at least provide a foundation for the truth.