[UCANSEE2]

The DNC/MSM/Hillary crew want us to KILL THE MESSENGER (Russia) and ignore the MESSAGE.

Best response to the claim that Russia did this is to say, “does it matter who exposed the criminal activity?”.

[UCANSEE2]

Merry Christmas.

[AdmSmith]

The real issue isn’t that Russian intelligence managed to get their hands on emails belonging to Hillary Clinton and other high-ranking Democrats—they did—rather that the Kremlin decided to employ its SIGINT as propaganda to hurt Hillary and her party in 2016. That effort Putin did personally direct, and he felt confident about doing so, fearing no retaliation, because he already had the measure of the man in the Oval Office.

The task of stemming Russian disinformation like the Kremlin weaponized in our election will soon fall to Republicans, who on January 20 will control the White House and both houses of Congress. Perhaps Kremlin agitprop aimed at Washington will wane, given Donald Trump’s excessively chummy relationship with Moscow, but Republicans now gloating about the pain inflicted on Democrats by Putin ought to ponder what would happen if the Russians exposed their emails too—because Moscow surely has them.

http://observer.com/2016/12/former-nsa-analyst-debunks-three-myths-about-russian-hacking/

[Sacajaweau]

Hillary just can’t get over the fact that she is not well liked and her only asset is that she brings in a lot of money for the party.

[Bogie]

As ye hack, so shall ye be hacked.

[trebb]

On the flip side - better to have a strong but rational man in charge than a really bats-hit crazy nutcase like Hillary...

[Reeses]

It’s surprising Israel isn’t ever mentioned as a suspect. They had the bigger motive and are smart enough to make it look like the Russians did it.

[TruthFactor]

Why even waste a minute of your time responding to the lying left? All they’re trying to do is progress their agenda with lies and disinformation. Make them the subject of the discussion, not their lies.

[lonevoice]

[FreeInWV]

Shouldn’t a fair amount of blame be given to those people who subverted the security infrastructure so they could use it freely with no oversight? The people who demanded that RSA hand over their master encryption keys. Who demanded that software makers build backdoors into their systems. Who dominated international boards so that we could only get weak encryption. Who bully all virus/malware tool providers to cover up known exploits. Who are content with other people performing exploits that cost people trillions, as long as their ruse is not destroyed. The people who could blackmail a foreign leader, US senator or supreme court justice with no oversight?

Hmmmm..... Who would those people be?