Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RitchieAprile
The service has begun an investigation into circumstances that led to the grounding of the cruiser. A report in Navy Times said Antietam was at anchor in the bay when high winds and a strong tide pushed the ship aground before the crew could maneuver the ship to safety. The service has been reluctant to elaborate on details leading to the grounding.

If the ship was at anchor, then would it not be at anchor where the harbor authorities told it to anchor? And wouldn't the captain assume that the harbor authorities knew what they were doing when the told him to park there? So why would the captain be at fault?

18 posted on 02/02/2017 10:37:34 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

It will be interesting to find out more details. Typically, when a ship is at anchor, the quartermaster watch takes a round of bearings at regular intervals to check on anchor drag.
Plus, any GPS unit on board this vessel would have an anchor drag alarm...heck, any cheap marine GPS has this alarm feature.


25 posted on 02/02/2017 11:50:24 AM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

You’ll probably get 8000 replies that say the same thing; the captain has total responsibility and is always at fault in any incident. I was on a ship that had a collision with another Navy ship. Both captains pretty much immediately relieved.


37 posted on 02/02/2017 6:48:35 PM PST by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson