Posted on 02/03/2017 12:56:39 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee
It is and that’s just a modest sampling from the last two day’s news. One or two are older. There was a great thread yesterday that started out with an article by a former SJW who said his contacts in that circle were absolutely talking about an insurrection. Apparently that thread was zotted for some reason. It was great intel.
Started small last time as well...my opinion history is repeating itself with some of the same players...Soros financing and media assisting.
save
I don't know.
Liberals calling violent authoritarian liberals “anarchists” are like Muslims calling Muslim terrorists “not really Muslim”. They want to deny the association with the ideology when they are really the embodiment of a violent, totalitarian ideology.
Good point, its so pervasive that its easy to miss all of it.
The man and his wife surrendered to UW police several hours later, claiming he fired in self-defense, according to law-enforcement officials. He was questioned and released. The Seattle Times is not naming the man because he has not been charged with a crime.
Here is the post about the former SJW who says he's hearing about the plans for an insurrection.
Folks who believe in strict constructionist interpretations of the US Constitution are ‘far right’ to the Old Gray Whore.
You could throw any of these gutless, wimpy anarchists into a cage match with a girl scout, and the scout will win every time.
Under Obama, and DHS’s Janet Napolitano some units of the U.S. military trained for a “Tea Party” inspired uprising. That same doctrine can today be used against a radical Left armed rebellion with, I believe, more enthusiasm than U.S. Soldiers and Marines would have exhibited against a Right Wing movement.
INSURRECTION ACT OF 1807
From Title 10 US Code the President may use the militia or Armed Forces to:
§ 331 Suppress an insurrection against a State government at the request of the Legislature or, if not in session, the Governor.
§ 332 Suppress unlawful obstruction or rebellion against the U.S.
§ 333 Suppress insurrection or domestic violence if it (1) hinders the execution of the laws to the extent that a part or class of citizens are deprived of Constitutional rights and the State is unable or refuses to protect those rights or (2) obstructs the execution of any Federal law or impedes the course of justice under Federal laws.)
http://www.businessinsider.com/us-military-armed-rebellion-2016-8
The anarchists also brought the so-called Red Scare on themselves, which didn’t help their cause too much when the FBI had them arrested and deported wholesale, with full cooperation from military intelligence and citizens groups who volunteered to monitor subversives—the model of counterinsurgency we should be applying today, with some legal adjustments to counter the left’s civil liberties advocates, descended directly from those who sprung up during the Red Scare—namely the ACLU and NLG, joined today by groups like the Cener for Constitutional Rights, CAIR, the Alliance for Global Justice, etc: the legal bulwarks of subversion that we must counter to win this fight.
Cener for Constitutional Rights = Center for Constitutional Rights
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.