Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anarchists Respond to Trump’s Inauguration, by Any Means Necessary
New York Times ^ | February 2, 2017 | By FARAH STOCKMAN

Posted on 02/03/2017 12:56:39 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Brad from Tennessee

It is and that’s just a modest sampling from the last two day’s news. One or two are older. There was a great thread yesterday that started out with an article by a former SJW who said his contacts in that circle were absolutely talking about an insurrection. Apparently that thread was zotted for some reason. It was great intel.


21 posted on 02/03/2017 2:08:33 PM PST by TigersEye (Winning. Winning winning winning every day!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: poinq

Started small last time as well...my opinion history is repeating itself with some of the same players...Soros financing and media assisting.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/remember-weather-underground-bloody-terrorism-at-home-in-1970s/2015/04/01/c68f8b8c-d17f-11e4-8fce-3941fc548f1c_story.html?utm_term=.94e31157068d


22 posted on 02/03/2017 2:09:51 PM PST by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

save


23 posted on 02/03/2017 2:10:13 PM PST by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lilypad
Didn’t Trump mentioned something about not tolerating civil disobedience .

I don't know.

24 posted on 02/03/2017 2:13:22 PM PST by TigersEye (Winning. Winning winning winning every day!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Liberals calling violent authoritarian liberals “anarchists” are like Muslims calling Muslim terrorists “not really Muslim”. They want to deny the association with the ideology when they are really the embodiment of a violent, totalitarian ideology.


25 posted on 02/03/2017 2:17:58 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwright

Good point, its so pervasive that its easy to miss all of it.


26 posted on 02/03/2017 2:22:18 PM PST by correctthought (Is it wrong to shoot a maoist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Just as I suspected, the New York Slimes talk about the shooting in Seattle but they purposely didn't mention this:

The man and his wife surrendered to UW police several hours later, claiming he fired in self-defense, according to law-enforcement officials. He was questioned and released. The Seattle Times is not naming the man because he has not been charged with a crime.

27 posted on 02/03/2017 2:23:21 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee; All
I was mistaken, it wasn't a thread and it wasn't zotted. It's very interesting IMO.

Here is the post about the former SJW who says he's hearing about the plans for an insurrection.

28 posted on 02/03/2017 2:46:07 PM PST by TigersEye (Winning. Winning winning winning every day!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Folks who believe in strict constructionist interpretations of the US Constitution are ‘far right’ to the Old Gray Whore.


29 posted on 02/03/2017 2:55:35 PM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

You could throw any of these gutless, wimpy anarchists into a cage match with a girl scout, and the scout will win every time.


30 posted on 02/03/2017 3:27:17 PM PST by sergeantdave (Cats are like potato chips - you can't have just one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Thanks. I'd imagine the FBI is following these developments. I think any effort to signal and coordinate these groups into an effective insurgency would be intercepted. Federal law enforcement has years of experience infiltrating radical groups. If necessary, the military could intervene.

Under Obama, and DHS’s Janet Napolitano some units of the U.S. military trained for a “Tea Party” inspired uprising. That same doctrine can today be used against a radical Left armed rebellion with, I believe, more enthusiasm than U.S. Soldiers and Marines would have exhibited against a Right Wing movement.

INSURRECTION ACT OF 1807

From Title 10 US Code the President may use the militia or Armed Forces to:

§ 331 – Suppress an insurrection against a State government at the request of the Legislature or, if not in session, the Governor.

§ 332 – Suppress unlawful obstruction or rebellion against the U.S.

§ 333 – Suppress insurrection or domestic violence if it (1) hinders the execution of the laws to the extent that a part or class of citizens are deprived of Constitutional rights and the State is unable or refuses to protect those rights or (2) obstructs the execution of any Federal law or impedes the course of justice under Federal laws.)

http://www.businessinsider.com/us-military-armed-rebellion-2016-8

31 posted on 02/03/2017 3:43:12 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The anarchists also brought the so-called Red Scare on themselves, which didn’t help their cause too much when the FBI had them arrested and deported wholesale, with full cooperation from military intelligence and citizens groups who volunteered to monitor subversives—the model of counterinsurgency we should be applying today, with some legal adjustments to counter the left’s civil liberties advocates, descended directly from those who sprung up during the Red Scare—namely the ACLU and NLG, joined today by groups like the Cener for Constitutional Rights, CAIR, the Alliance for Global Justice, etc: the legal bulwarks of subversion that we must counter to win this fight.


32 posted on 02/03/2017 5:11:41 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Cener for Constitutional Rights = Center for Constitutional Rights


33 posted on 02/03/2017 5:15:40 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson