Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge’s blocking of travel ban sets stage for epic court battle
nypost.com ^ | February 4, 2017 | 12:48am | By Joe Tacopino and Daniel Halper

Posted on 02/04/2017 8:52:30 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

A federal judge in Seattle Friday struck down a week-old executive order that barred all refugees and travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations from entering the United States — a dramatic move that set the stage for a contentious battle between President Trump and the courts.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I this excellently stated "A message to criminal migrants" , British blogger Pat Condell paints a vivid picture of what a PC culture can do to ruin a society. While it is meant for British Parliament, it serves as a good wake up call for people following our immigration battle.
21 posted on 02/04/2017 9:08:11 AM PST by Baynative ( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone; NormsRevenge; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; SunkenCiv; ...

See #8 and #11 for more;


22 posted on 02/04/2017 9:08:33 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Climate Change no longer mentioned on the White House website)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I am not an expert but besides the merit of the case, isn’t a Federal judge limited to a geographical area? I know district courts only rule over districts and their rulings only effect those within the district, so how can a lower court rule nation wide, isn’t that what the Supreme Court does.

Now as to the merit, didn’t Obama already win the case on what states can and can not do over immigration (very little, it is a federal obligation.)


23 posted on 02/04/2017 9:09:57 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
A federal judge in Seattle Friday struck down a week-old executive order that barred all refugees and travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations...

I'm so tired of the propaganda, even from the NY Post. The ban isn't on "Muslim-majority" nations, the ban is on nations that have been compromised by terrorism.

...from entering the United States — a dramatic move that set the stage for a contentious battle between President Trump and the courts.

Let the left battle the courts. Trump should ignore the incorrect court order. Perhaps he'll do that once Gorsuch is in place on the SC.

24 posted on 02/04/2017 9:10:40 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Apparently the Rights of American Citizens are second to the Rights of Non American Citizens, even the ones that aren’t actually residing in the United States..

After watching the two Lawyers in Tucker Carlson’s Show last night it was apparent that we are in much more trouble than I imagined.

One of them even pulled out the Statue of Liberty Poem to bolster his position against President Trump’s EO.


25 posted on 02/04/2017 9:11:29 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (The way Liberals carry on, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I expected the appeal of the stay by noon today.
Instead “The Department of Homeland Security says it has suspended “any and all actions” regarding President Trump’s ban on citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries entering the United States” an hour ago.
Don’t know what Trump’s up to.


26 posted on 02/04/2017 9:11:59 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Dear Judge, You have three options, 1. Resign 2. Retire 3. prepare for impeachment!


27 posted on 02/04/2017 9:13:05 AM PST by Colo9250 (Time to dump the trash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
"So one Federal Court District judge can rule over the entire country?"

I'm confused as to how so many different jurisdictions can rule on this matter. I thought that challenges to federal policies had to go through courts in the DC circuit.

Doesn't this imply that the Trump administration would have to convince all 11 circuits of the legitimacy of his policies? Doesn't seem right to me.

28 posted on 02/04/2017 9:13:58 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Hasn’t precedent already been set with this, based on past Presidential immigration bans?


29 posted on 02/04/2017 9:14:04 AM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

exactly. Media hype.

The Seattle punk has clearly overstepped its boundaries, and will not prevail.

The founders NEVER gave the judiciary the right or privilege to determine immigration policy of these United States. Never.


30 posted on 02/04/2017 9:15:28 AM PST by SoFloFreeper (Isaiah 25:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1
THE EXECUTIVE has the right in this instance and liberal judges better learn that FACT really quick or ALL will be replaced.

Sounds good to me, but how exactly does it happen?

31 posted on 02/04/2017 9:16:36 AM PST by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

The law clearly states that the President in national security can boycott aliens.
The EO clearly did not mention the word of muslims , or Islam.
If this was a ban of muslims then why can muslims come here from other countries?
This judge stated that the EO was discriminatory on muslims when the EO does not state any such thing.

This judge used a liberal talking point to stop President Trump.

This judge needs to be removed ASAP, and why has the DOJ not got to court yet with an emergency order to put the ban into place?


32 posted on 02/04/2017 9:16:53 AM PST by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
You are right...that is what should happen....and would happen if we had the new Judge in place.

But the current Supreme Court is a little screwy!

33 posted on 02/04/2017 9:17:50 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Climate Change no longer mentioned on the White House website)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Did Obama praise this judge yet or is he waiting for Sunday morning head thing


34 posted on 02/04/2017 9:18:59 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Impeach the ***damned tyrant judge legislating from the bench and putting our lives at risk.

Curtail their scope and power greatly.

This is ridiculous!


35 posted on 02/04/2017 9:20:25 AM PST by chris37 (Glory, glory, hallelujah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Its not going to be very epic. A quick overturn is the likely outcome. The Seattle judge is trying g to argue for rational review of the law making branch of govt and cites no precedents. Its a loser with the 9th circuit appeals court. The Boston judge who upheld the ban gasve three precedents.


36 posted on 02/04/2017 9:21:18 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott
Yep. The Bush family is the worst thing to ever happen to the republican party. I don’t have a bit of use for any of them.

DITTO!


37 posted on 02/04/2017 9:21:42 AM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: manc

You can refresh here for when the appeal goes live - https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000860


38 posted on 02/04/2017 9:22:49 AM PST by Voluntaryist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

When a court “order” is a clear violation of proper executive power it doesn’t set up anything...except a HARSH slapdown. The Left will stop at no outrage unless and until they are beaten bloody.


39 posted on 02/04/2017 9:23:57 AM PST by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

He is a Federal Judge!


40 posted on 02/04/2017 9:24:09 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Climate Change no longer mentioned on the White House website)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson