Posted on 02/10/2017 5:22:10 PM PST by HarleyLady27
Talk about “Eyes in the back of your head” his eyes are so sunken his vision must be like looking through binoculars.
I’m not buying it.
These “judges” aren’t doing this to reverse the decision but to reinforce it...9-0.
Reassign the states within the 9th to other judicial districts—place the states of California, Washington and so forth into districts with a conservative track record. Erase all vestiges of the 9th for incompetence, based on their 85% record of exhibiting poor judgement.
True. They never even quoted the USC Title and Section #’s or the CFR.
True. They never even quoted the USC Title and Section #’s or the CFR.
True. They never even quoted the USC Title and Section #’s or the CFR.
Or the legislative act of the congress that authorized the executive order.
Are you thinking what I’m thinking??? Trump played them...he wanted his ‘ban’ to work and knew he had to play this way first, they messed up and now he has them by the (whatevers)....
While they are playing ‘fish’ President Trump is playing 3 D Chess...
WTF? The three stooges are now asking the full 9th district court to pull their stupid fat asses out of the fire.
Trump needs to dramatically increase the number of federal judges. Outnumber the libs 10 to 1 and should get criminal cases done in a faster manner.
How were the 3 judges chosen for the panel?
Did the three 9th judges think that was going to be the end of this issue? Maybe in the 2-dimensional universe their minds dwell within. Once the statute is brought forward for the 1st time their emotional reasoning is crushed. They’re running grade-school Pop Warner plays against the winner of the Superbowl.
Actually it would be more like 27-0, if your view is correct.
This is their one shot at redemption, and it is coming from within, not as a request by the any of the parties involved.
Highly unusual.
It's supposed to be random. 2 sitting judges and 1 senior judge. I think we know which one is the senior judge.
Put AZ in the fifth and create a new one for Alaska,Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington.
The 9th circuit cannot begin to argue it is a court of law when a 3-judge panel upholds a decision without any reference to much less analysis of the law in force, the statutory interpretation, according to accepted cannons of interpretation, an analysis of the applicability to the order, and an effort to determine which parts of the order might be in violation of which parts of the statute and further any effort to conform the statute to the U.S. constitution.
*************************************************
That’s why I don’t think Trump should give them another chance. They have no intention of reversing the decision, they just want a chance to clean up their mess and actually try to site some law with a better written decision.
So the Court, on its own motion, is essentially trying to appeal its own ruling?
Bizarre. Sounds like maybe an attempt to get another hearing so they can create another round of super negative news stories for the President with another ruling against him.
Black robed politicians are part of the swamp most people aren’t looking at. Fortunately President Trump is.
This sua sponte motion for an en banc review must be causing a lot of late night oil burning at Justice trying to figure out what their next move is. One could suggest that this reduces the game to one of two outcomes: 1. they reverse the lower courts and allow the order to stand while the lower court hears the case, or 2. They affirm, after writing a much stronger opinion, and force DOJ to go to the Supreme Court [because of the weight of precedent established].
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.