What The F%*k is "good behavior" about an 80% overturned rate? Those three venal scumbags should be disbarred, disrobed, and sphinc-raped in public for what they've done.
DEATH BY BUNGA!!!!!
LOL!
Please don’t hold back, tell us how you really feel. ROTFLMAO
Vlad The Impaler themed black robe on a pike?
BUNGA BUNGA !!!
>
Demands It Be Protected From Itself…, Gargantua wrote:
They are appointed to serve for life “during good behavior.”
What The F%*k is “good behavior” about an 80% overturned rate? Those three venal scumbags should be disbarred, disrobed, and sphinc-raped in public for what they’ve done.
>
I wouldn’t even coach it in ‘the overturn rate of X%’ (an alternate fact as it may be).
You want to cite chapter and verse of the Constitution, followed by precedent, you make your case (pun intended); that *is* their job. But, it should be hammered home that the panel did not rule on the LAW (no mention, no reference, not even a side-ways glance), but ENTIRELY upon F-E-E-L-I-N-G-S and the prejudice of the their own political bent.
IMO, that breeches ‘good behavior’. They wish to be law MAKERS, they won’t\shouldn’t (technically, CANNOT) be doing so from the bench. Congress and the States should be doing more in this area than they have since the Courts self-endowment of ‘final arbiter’ status.
They are appointed to serve for life “during good behavior.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Every American who has not yet been indoctrinated to support the Marxist Left’s attempt to destroy our Constitutional Republic should demand the enactment of legislation requiring TERM LIMITS (TWO TERMS) for ALL senators, congressmen, and judges.
That’s a biased statistic: 80% of the judgements which are appealed are overturned.But if SCOTUS doesn’t accept an appeal, or if no appeal is made, those cases don’t count.
It would seem that, ideally (from the SCOTUS POV), the overturn rate of those appeals heard by SCOTUS should be high. If there is no chance SCOTUS will overturn, SCOTUS doesn’t want to hear the case.
I read that Justice Kennedy would decide whether this appeal from the Ninth should be heard; if that is generally true for Ninth Circuit cases that could explain the high rate of SCOTUS reversals. Kennedy is usually the swing vote on SCOTUS; if he goes conservative the conservatives win, if he goes liberal the liberals win. So it would seem that appeals he decides should be heard by SCOTUS are pretty much sitting ducks at the SCOTUS level.
Just guessing, and IANAL.