Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Leak Now Points To Bezos’ Hidden $600M Deal With Obama CIA To Feed Washington Post
Conservative Daily Post ^ | Feb 24, 2017 | Donna Kay

Posted on 02/24/2017 12:30:34 PM PST by Hostage

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Hostage; Lazamataz

If you are going to discuss Bezos, you should at least mention that he was one of the early investors in Google: http://www.growthink.com/content/story-jeff-bezos%E2%80%99-250000-investment-google-1998


61 posted on 02/24/2017 11:21:50 PM PST by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Oh, Bezos was also an early investor in Twitter, Uber, and AirBnB.


62 posted on 02/24/2017 11:26:08 PM PST by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

The CIA has all kinds of agents in all kinds of places including the media. they have a lot at stake. Right now this is the biggest play around and it may hit soon.
.......................
http://militarycorruption.com/humaabedin.htm#

SPECIAL REPORT

FEDS FLIP HUMA ABEDIN - ONETIME CLOSEST
HILLARY CLINTON AIDE NOW SINGING TO GRAND
JURY IN ORDER TO SAVE HER AND PERVERT
HUBBY ANTHONY WEINER FROM GOING TO JAIL
SOURCES TELL MILITARYCORRUPTION.COM
WOULD-BE “COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF” CLINTON
RATTED-OUT BY BOTH BILL AND WOMAN SOME
SAY IS A SAUDI AGENT - HILLARY’S ALLEGED
“LESBIAN LOVER” HOLDS KEY TO CLINTON
FOUNDATION “PAY-TO-PLAY” $CAM - PROMISE
OF IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION MAY PROVE
ENOUGH FOR HUMA TO BRING HILLARY DOWN

© 2017 MilitaryCorruption.com

HUMA ABEDINIt is Hillary Clinton’s worst nightmare, and the reason she freaked out so badly on election night last November. When the would-be “commander-in-chief” realized that Donald Trump had won and would soon sic the Feds on her, the shrill former First Lady went crazy, cursing out and beating on her failed campaign guru John Podesta.

In an incredible break with tradition, the defeated Democrat refused to appear before her deluded but devoted followers that night at the Brooklyn, N.Y. campaign headquarters. It was up to Podesta to go out and try and mollify the crowd. Our informed source told us the Hildabeast needed an injection from a doctor to calm down and get any sleep.

No more sweet dreams of becoming the first female President and getting a “Keep Out of Jail Free” card for the next four to eight years. Hillary’s checkered past has at last caught up with her. As we reported several weeks back, hound dog hubby Bill Clinton has cut a deal with the Feds (see Related Stories below) to tell all he knows about Hillary and her Clinton Foundation money deals.

CLOSING IN ON HILLARY CLINTON

Now, her closest aide, and some say “lesbian lover” Huma Abedin, has agreed to accept immunity from prosecution in exchange for all the dirt about “pay-to-play” deals with foreign governments made while Hillary was serving as U.S. Secretary of State. That is what law enforcement sources are saying.

The mainstream media, totally committed to bringing down the Trump Administration, can only hope they succeed before Hillary goes on trial. It is no longer a question of “will she or won’t she be indicted?” but of “when” the hammer drops on her head. Expect her apologists and cheerleaders among the Washington media elites to drag out that old line about a grand jury being able to “indict a ham sandwich.”

But with evidence piling up, and plagued by ill health as well, Hillary Clinton may yet become the first First Lady in American history to end up behind bars. We would never have dared hope she would face justice after so many years of avoiding it, but with a wink and a nod, President Trump has let Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director James Comey know that in his administration, no one is above the law.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: — For our many thousands of military readers, remember that investigators have the names of several high-ranking officers said to be linked to an international child sex ring. Weiner’s laptop was a goldmine of information. The senior officers’ day of reckoning is coming. Suddenly putting in for retirement won’t save these sickos from exposure and ruin.

As for Anthony Weiner, we know you read MCC, you disgusting pervert, so pass along to your estranged wife that MilitaryCorruption.com stands ready to publish - uncensored, and word-for-word - any statement that Huma Abedin or you wish to make now, or in the future, regarding the rapidly deteriorating situation you both find yourself in.]


63 posted on 02/25/2017 4:03:10 AM PST by rodguy911 (Home of the Free becasue of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt; PGalt
When writing the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, one area of speech the Founders were specifically interested in protecting was that of a free press. They saw the press as a sort of fourth branch of government, one that would keep the “checks and balances” of the other three branches honest.
Somebody got a cite for that? I think this is "fake history." What the founders didn't want was government controlled press. I doubt they saw the press as having any sort of quasi-governmental function. Keeping the government in check falls to the people. The press isn't anything special now, and wasn't then.
The printing press was, at the writing/ratification of 1A, the technical means of promoting facts, ideas, and opinions - about subjects mundane and controversial. Before it promulgates “the freedom of the press," 1A mentions religion, and after that, it mentions politics - the two things one politely refrains from bringing up at a dinner table (other than among the like-minded).

Since the Constitution specifically encourages "the progress of science and useful arts” - and since the Ninth Amendment makes plain that the Bill of Rights is to be understood only as a floor under our rights, and in no sense a ceiling on them - nothing in the Constitution justifies government control over printing or any other technical means of promoting political opinions.

There can be no question of “printer” being a title of nobility, the grant of which is expressly forbidden to the Federal and, separately, to the State governments. And without an established religion, there is no question of journalists being a priesthood which you or I are obligated to respect. Talk about “the press” as “the fourth Estate” is fatuous, considering that the term comes from France, and the other “Estates” included “the nobility” and “the priesthood.” That is, “the freedom of the press” is a right of the people. The right of the people to spend their own money (in unlimited amounts) to buy or rent technical means of promoting their own ideas.

So yes, in a way it is true that it falls to “the press” to check the government, but

The members of the elected branches are controlled at the ballot box. The wire services homogenize “the press” into a single entity which amplifies the perceived interests of journalism as a business (a “special interest,” if you will). The interest of journalism is to be influential. Journalists hold that nothing actually matters except PR - and they control PR. The implication of that is that journalism is cynical about society (“the people”) and naive about government. Government, in that view, has great power to do good (under the tutelage of journalism), and the only limit to how much good government actually does is the intentions of those in office.

Conservatives agree with Thomas Paine that, to the contrary, government is at best a necessary evil and that society, even at worst, is a blessing.

Thanks for the ping, PG.

64 posted on 02/25/2017 7:51:04 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which ‘liberalism’ coheres is that NOTHING ACTUALLY MATTERS except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
Amazing how almost NO conservatives come up with the next big thing in tech.

Did you see Bill O'Reilly try to tell Mark Cuban what Tech could and could not do? Bill is a Luddite and only slightly less Liberal than most other talking heads on FOX.

65 posted on 02/25/2017 8:29:38 AM PST by itsahoot (Return the power to the people, and Mexico will pay for the wall, 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Try Costco.

Costco is a leftists cesspool. Wal-Mart is only slightly less leftist because I suppose all of Sam Walton's genes haven't been totally lost.

66 posted on 02/25/2017 8:47:08 AM PST by itsahoot (Return the power to the people, and Mexico will pay for the wall, 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson