I am not disagreeing that they are proven dirtbags, but how do we know there is no warrant.
correct Jim. the FISA warrant did not cover what they ending up doing! (which is much, much worse)
All are measuring this by being normal.. legit... legal... BUT obama is not any of those.... he is a criminal and I am offended that they are treating him as if he is a good man.. He is not a good man... and they are the most blind people there ever was... either that or so dumb!!!!
I didn’t miss it!
I screamed it at the TV GMA STEPPINALLOVERUS THIS MORNING!.............
This is deep swamp country. I have great faith in POTUS DJT. But I fear for his safety. It is dark and dangerous in the swamp at night!
I am hoping to see this to be proven true in the next few days.
Methinks that the application for the first FISA warrant was to cover what they were already doing. It was rejected. They continued with their “taps” without the court cover. The second FISA was approved to cover their existing activities IMHO.
But it’s against the law without the FISA court order... says the media.
Exactly!
Precisely.
Plus whoever leaked this to NYT should be charged with a felony
Precisely.
Plus whoever leaked this to NYT should be charged with a felony
Or some FISA warrant was granted but surveillance exceeded the limits of the warrant, more targets and/or continuing surveillance when the purpose stated in the warrant had not been satisfied.
I have seen some media references suggesting that the target was only supposed to be one or two Russian banks and their communications — could well be that someone violated procedures (and laws) by expanding on that initial task to new targets, etc.
The Obama flunkies keep talking as though we should assume that no one would ever do anything but what was allowed by law. Critical minds do not make such foolish assumptions!
Very astute Mr. R., very astute indeed.....
AsPresident he can require DOJ to give him all documents on this. correct?
Prediction: FISA warrant turns up “missing”.
There are some indications that the NSA and Adm. Mike Rogers are involved, either as conspirators or whistle-blowers, or maybe even both!
Hints in the context of this story:
If so, it would be monstrous.
Well, it would be monstrous, if done the a Republican President.
And even a warrant would be an abuse.
Interesting and probably very true. bump for later analysis.
I have no doubt hillary would use such information. She and Brazille seem totally unashamed about her using pilfered debate questions.
Another question comes up. Bernie Sanders abandoned his campaign for a few meaningless items in the platform and a beach house. It makes one wonder if they had dug up dirt on him.