Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: akalinin; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican

This is the only election I can recall where anyone was still discussing who the loser would have appointed to the cabinet AFTER the election.

I wonder if McCain was really gonna go with Phill Gramm at Treasury.

And who would Goldwater have tapped for State?


15 posted on 03/07/2017 10:34:42 PM PST by Impy (End the kritarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Impy
This is the only election I can recall where anyone was still discussing who the loser would have appointed to the cabinet AFTER the election.

You're right. But the consequences of her election would have been so frightening that pointing it out from time to time is beneficial.


17 posted on 03/08/2017 5:16:56 AM PST by farming pharmer (www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Impy

Maybe Goldwater would’ve put Gov. George Wallace at State.

It’s curious to note that Goldwater was the last Republican nominee so viscerally reviled and opposed by the establishment until Trump (Reagan reached out to them). Goldwater would’ve had to go outside the party establishment (and the party, period) to assemble a Cabinet and government. The GOP was lacking for leadership so badly at that time, mostly infested with left-wingers in Governorships and Congress. If he had tried to put them in key positions, they would’ve been constantly seeking to undermine him (Rockefeller, Scranton, et al).


18 posted on 03/08/2017 8:23:04 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson