To: elhombrelibre
As much as I dislike Russia, I don’t see how a treaty made with a different and defunct country (the U.S.S.R) applies to them now.
2 posted on
03/08/2017 12:46:23 PM PST by
SecondAmendment
(Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
To: ETL; 1rudeboy
To: elhombrelibre
Since these missiles are aimed at the former Europe, this actually IS a Muslim Ban.
4 posted on
03/08/2017 12:56:11 PM PST by
The Toll
To: elhombrelibre
Who can blame them with the way the democrat party and their media are behaving...we are threatening them...
6 posted on
03/08/2017 1:01:49 PM PST by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: elhombrelibre
Here is the legal problem.
When someone tells you a certain act or omission violates the “the spirit and intent” of any agreement, that means the other side didn’t violate the written agreement, which usually means the other side outsmarted you in the original negotiation.
11 posted on
03/08/2017 1:44:45 PM PST by
Strac6
("We sleep safe in our beds only because rough men stand ready to visit violence on the enemy.")
To: elhombrelibre
gee gomer
da ya thank its in response to OUR MISSLE DEPLOYMENT,,,,?????
DUH
12 posted on
03/08/2017 2:10:44 PM PST by
zzwhale
To: elhombrelibre
violation of "the spirit and intent" of a nuclear arms treaty In other words, it doesn't really violate the agreement. That's why the actual words on paper matter.
15 posted on
03/08/2017 3:56:50 PM PST by
Hugin
(Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
To: elhombrelibre
Anyone find odd that sea based cruise missiles are allowed but not land based ones?
18 posted on
03/08/2017 6:27:30 PM PST by
RedWulf
(#purge the nevertrumpers)
To: elhombrelibre
...Russia of deploying a land-based cruise missile... It is called the Flexible.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson