Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Tweaks for ‘Ryancare’
American Thinker ^ | March 14, 2017 | Jon N. Hall

Posted on 03/14/2017 6:21:45 AM PDT by Kaslin

The structure and character of the federal government is largely the creation of Democrats. From Woodrow Wilson to FDR to LBJ to Barack Hussein Obama, every time progressive Democrats seize the presidency and Congress, they expand the size and scope of the central government. When Republicans recapture power, they are either unable or unwilling to roll back the Dems’ expansions. And so, the New Deal, the Great Society, and quite likely ObamaCare become permanent parts of government, and the Leviathan continues to grow.

Although Republicans have promised for years to “repeal and replace” ObamaCare, since the March 7 unveiling of their replacement plan we see division in their ranks. The replacement plan is called the “American Health Care Act.” But let’s call it “RyanCare.” In its current form, RyanCare appears better than ObamaCare, (that’s a low bar to clear). But RyanCare has some of the same problems as ObamaCare. Herein are two tweaks to improve the bill.

One of the big pluses of RyanCare is that it ends the mandates. The employer mandate is a huge drag on the economy and the individual mandate may be fascistic. But the reason the hated mandates were part of the ObamaCare is so insurance companies could accommodate “guaranteed issue” and “community rating,” which supposedly make it possible for “pre-existing conditions” to be covered. The idea was to enlarge the pool of policyholders with healthy young people so that the sickest among us could be paid for. RyanCare retains the two requirements: “Prohibit health insurers from denying coverage or charging more money to patients based on pre-existing conditions.”

Without the mandates, how’s that going to work?

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: barackhussein0ma; demonrats; obamatrumpcare; trumpcare; trumplikesit; trumpsaysvoteforit; worstpresidentever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 03/14/2017 6:21:45 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Here’s the 2 tweaks needed: Fire Ryan and put a real conservative in charge of the house then Repeal Obamacare.


2 posted on 03/14/2017 6:24:02 AM PDT by RedWulf (#purge the nevertrumpers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

I’d go for that.


3 posted on 03/14/2017 6:25:18 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

Noobie: Isn’t that up to the voters of Wisconsin?


4 posted on 03/14/2017 6:27:59 AM PDT by Kaslin ( In America, we understand that a nation is only living as long as it is striving- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I’m sure you would, but like I said it’s up to the voters of Wisconsin, not to anyone else.


5 posted on 03/14/2017 6:30:32 AM PDT by Kaslin ( In America, we understand that a nation is only living as long as it is striving- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But here’s the thing: we already have a healthcare program for those who can’t afford to pay health insurance premiums; it’s called Medicaid. Rather than instituting another entitlement, Republicans might put those receiving ObamaCare subsidies into Medicaid.

And if a state choses not to expand Medicaid to cover them? Nineteen states did not.

6 posted on 03/14/2017 6:31:55 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And I keep seeing that 14 million will be without health insurance after the repeal. Wouldn’t that apply to those who DO NOT WANT TO PURCHASE HEALTH INSURANCE?? The Left and it’s sycophant Media will twist every word to damage anything the Republicans try, to improve our lives. A POX on all their houses!


7 posted on 03/14/2017 6:32:23 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

>Noobie: Isn’t that up to the voters of Wisconsin?

Hey Rino, we own the house and we don’t need the disloyal, Lyin Ryan who won’t repeal Obamacare as speaker. He needs to be replaced by an actual conservative who will repeal Obamacare.


8 posted on 03/14/2017 6:33:25 AM PDT by RedWulf (#purge the nevertrumpers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I’m sure you would, but like I said it’s up to the voters of Wisconsin, not to anyone else.

Firing Ryan as a Congresscritter is up to the voters of Wisconsin. Firing him as Speaker is up to the GOP in Congress - a different but still difficult question.

9 posted on 03/14/2017 6:35:10 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
And I keep seeing that 14 million will be without health insurance after the repeal. Wouldn’t that apply to those who DO NOT WANT TO PURCHASE HEALTH INSURANCE??

If you're talking about the CBO report, they do say that 14 million fewer people would have coverage next year and they do say that most of those will be people who choose not to buy insurance, either because they don't want it or because they can no longer afford the premiums. But the report goes on to say that the rest of the 21-plus million who do not have coverage by 2020 will be because the Medicaid expansion is done away with.

10 posted on 03/14/2017 6:37:10 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m pretty sure the implication was to fire him from his Speaker position—not from his sinecure in WI.


11 posted on 03/14/2017 6:40:43 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It would be interesting to me if someone, Robinson, say, start a poll here about what FRiends want: Outright repeal or repeal and replace.


12 posted on 03/14/2017 6:53:29 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They seem to forget that many businesses cut jobs to part time to avoid covering all employees.


13 posted on 03/14/2017 6:55:38 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hero a tweak I’d like l see: Any healthcare provider who decides to treat someone with no ability to pay is forbidden by law from spreading the cost out to those who can pay.


14 posted on 03/14/2017 6:56:19 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

>I’m pretty sure the implication was to fire him from his Speaker position—not from his sinecure in WI.

We can do both.


15 posted on 03/14/2017 6:57:57 AM PDT by RedWulf (#purge the nevertrumpers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf; Kaslin

Unfortunately I think he is very safe in his seat—even if he gets booted from his Speakership. And as Kaslin correctly points out, that is more of a local decision.


16 posted on 03/14/2017 7:02:39 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

Fire Ryan and put a real conservative in charge of the house then Repeal Obamacare.

***************

Aye to that.


17 posted on 03/14/2017 7:03:28 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

To fire him as speaker? No.. that can be done by the house republicans.

WI should ditch him. but we can get him out of the spot light by simply removing him from the speakership.


18 posted on 03/14/2017 7:05:39 AM PDT by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

Is Ryan outnumbered?


19 posted on 03/14/2017 7:07:51 AM PDT by Leep (Cyclops Network News (CNN). The Most Trusted Source Of Fake News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

You realize that what you request would require 60 votes in the Senate, which the Republicans do not have. So in effect what you are requesting is that Obamacare continue “as is” in perpetuity. That’s probably what you want. Is mean Paul Ryan taking your welfare away?


20 posted on 03/14/2017 7:19:03 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson