1 posted on
03/16/2017 9:49:19 AM PDT by
drewh
To: drewh
Gawd how I wish I had the Depends concession for Washington, DC
To: drewh
It has to be said
BEST ELECTION. EVER
4 posted on
03/16/2017 9:53:18 AM PDT by
atc23
(The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
To: drewh
I've observed two things happening over the last couple of weeks since Trump's legendary series of Twitter messages related to Russia and the Obama "wiretapping" story:
1. Lindsey Graham has gone silent.
2. John McCain is showing increasing signs of mental instability.
I have a strong feeling that these are both related to whatever Trump is hinting at.
5 posted on
03/16/2017 9:55:12 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
To: drewh
But the House Intelligence Committees top Republican says hes seen no evidence to support Trumps claim.So what....That doesn't mean it's not there.......
10 posted on
03/16/2017 9:57:52 AM PDT by
Mopp4
To: drewh
Entirely unrelated that Obama, sans family, is incommunicado for a month at a remote resort in Tahiti
12 posted on
03/16/2017 10:00:37 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
To: drewh
It would have been so much better if Trump would have tweeted nothing about wire tapping but would have gone directly to Sessions and consulted with him.
13 posted on
03/16/2017 10:00:59 AM PDT by
353FMG
(AMERICA FIRST.)
To: drewh
Aooner, rather than Aater.
18 posted on
03/16/2017 10:07:22 AM PDT by
Mr.Unique
(The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
To: drewh
.... I find it curious that Nunes, Schiff and a whole cadre of stuffed shirts keep repeating that they have seen NO Evidence of "Wiretapping." Note that they are hanging everything upon the term "Wiretapping." Heck they may actually be very correct about there being no "Wiretapping" but notice that they never address the use of the terms "Surveillance" or "Electronic Surveillance" or even "Invasive Surveillance."
.... Nope they insist that they have seen no evidence that Obama operatives snuck into Trump Tower and attached the old Radioshack Junior Spy Wired gizmos into the phone receivers or even the Presidents cell phone.
20 posted on
03/16/2017 10:12:21 AM PDT by
R_Kangel
( "A Nation of Sheep ..... Will Beget ..... a Nation Ruled by Wolves.")
To: drewh
How is it that the Intelligence Committees seem so far out of the loop. Does any agency provide information and people to testify without a subpoena? Are inquiries done under oath?
24 posted on
03/16/2017 10:25:30 AM PDT by
stocksthatgoup
(There will come a time when those screaming Fascists are in fact the actual Facists. W Churchill)
To: drewh
Based on his broadside of a barn definition of wiretapping on Tucker’s show, I’ll concede he’s right. He had secret service protection during that time and I’m sure they surveillance was a part of their misdion, just like it is today. Protect Mr. Trump. And at that time, the SS reported to sn agency that fell under Mr. Obama’s oversight.
To: drewh
Getting the conversations via British intelligence is a great way to hide your tracks.
Maybe one of the Brits will spill the beans?
28 posted on
03/16/2017 10:38:44 AM PDT by
AmusedBystander
(The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
To: drewh
I hope so and it’s not O’Keefe’ing it or Assange’ing it.
To: drewh
36 posted on
03/16/2017 12:45:39 PM PDT by
Bodleian_Girl
(Please check out TheCitizensAudit.com to find out what David Brock has been doing)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson