Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucker Carlson Destroys Liberal Law Professor Who Supports Sanctuary Cities (VIDEO)
thegatewaypundit ^ | Cristina Laila

Posted on 03/29/2017 6:57:20 AM PDT by davikkm

Tucker Carlson annihilated a liberal law professor from NYC who supports ‘sanctuary cities’ which ultimately exploits low-wage labor.

‘Do you ever think ‘how did I get in this place’? OUCH!

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/846903057610792963

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: professor; sanctuarycities; tuckercarlson

1 posted on 03/29/2017 6:57:20 AM PDT by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davikkm

I do wish Tucker would Interrupt and Correct every Left Wing guest, every single time they use the word Immigrant, “No Sir/Maam, this discussion is Not about Immigrants, We are discussing Illegal Aliens.”

Because the obfuscation and refusal of the Left to admit that there are “Illegal Immigrants” in the US, is the Crux of the Problem. Illegal Immigrants are stealing jobs, Illegal Immigrants are lowering wages for America’s working poor, Illegal Immigrant populations are fomenting unacceptable Gang Violence in their communities, and Illegal Immigrant voter fraud is rampant and systemically disenfranchising our Legal Citizen’s rights to vote in this country.


2 posted on 03/29/2017 6:57:47 AM PDT by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

“..Illegal Immigrants..” - no such thing!

An “immigrant” is legal and holds a Green Card or other document so saying.

They are “illegal aliens.”


3 posted on 03/29/2017 7:02:39 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Tucker chops em up again.
Last week, it was the Maryland rapist’s attorney.


4 posted on 03/29/2017 7:04:45 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

This guy was whinging about our “broken” immigrations system and how we should fix it by legalizing all the illegal alien invaders. There is nothing wrong with our system aside from being ignored by the Bush/Clinton/Obama cabal for the last 30 years or so.


5 posted on 03/29/2017 7:09:15 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Well, yes. But Tucker has to do this night after night after night to just stay even. They (liberals and shills) line up like lemmings, each hoping to be the one that lands a blow. If that ever DOES or WILL happen will be an MSM day he won’t ever recover from.

They - THEY (liberals and shills) don’t care about the reason and logic and the common sense. They are only concerned about the rapid-fire words and phrases they can deliver in a short exchange. Many watching, by accident or on purpose will be predisposed to look for a Tucker counter point.

Water off a duck’s back and they know when that phrase or words, or that like them, get repeated enough, they LAND.

It’s great for ratings, but when they get dozens of instances of “the mantra” repeated on air, it serves their purpose.


6 posted on 03/29/2017 7:15:27 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I like his smiling, laughing and snickering at opponents’ arguments.
Last week’s lawyer came in out-gunned.


7 posted on 03/29/2017 7:19:07 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: davikkm
All this "Destroys" BS... can't we start using another verb... how about "Rubish"..

Just sounds so silly. Each and every time I see someone "Destroyed", all I see is an argument (somewhat) effectively refuted. Thats it. Destroys to me implies that the object of said Destruction is at least left absolutely speechless, or in tears or something...

8 posted on 03/29/2017 7:20:02 AM PDT by Paradox ("Donald Trump", the biggest Strawman ever created.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

“Rubbish”, Rubbishes, whatever. Destroy, annihilates... I watch and am left underwhelmed.


9 posted on 03/29/2017 7:23:12 AM PDT by Paradox ("Donald Trump", the biggest Strawman ever created.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: davikkm
Tucker Carlson "Destroys"

And yet, no obituary nor missing persons report.

10 posted on 03/29/2017 7:24:45 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Don’t get me wrong. I very much like watching him take these posers on. I was just kind of commenting on whey these leeches keep coming back for more. Their lucky goal is landing a punch. Their day-in-day-out goal is REPETITION. Either one is the same to them I think. But landing a blow would just be icing on the birthday cake.


11 posted on 03/29/2017 7:33:31 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

I prefer CRIMINAL.

It cuts through all the BS (aka Socialist talking points).


12 posted on 03/29/2017 8:06:24 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davikkm
Watched this last evening. My first thought was, why do all these liberal professors have a gay-ness to them, even the lisp.

Nauseate me.

13 posted on 03/29/2017 8:12:09 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

All his guests read from the same script. .. it’s getting boring.


14 posted on 03/29/2017 8:19:29 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Tucker is good, but he’s not on top of everything (understandably), and I think really needs better (or more?) producers. There almost always is a publicly available further question or counter to his guest that he doesn’t use.

For example, in this case, the issue of the UK or another partner providing the domestic spying info. Also, when asked about all information being collected, Tucker both needlessly qualifies it as data trunks coming into the US, rather than within the US domestically, and doesn’t follow up on the weasel-word qualification of “analysis” and “analyses” that Gowdy switches to when asked about that wholesale data collection.

The same sort of trip ups can be pointed out in most of his interviews. That is, he and his show have an opportunity to get still better—which would really draw in the ratings.


15 posted on 03/29/2017 8:42:29 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson