Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s O.K., California. Breaking Up Isn’t Hard to Do
New York Times ^ | 04/04/2017 | By STEVEN GREENHUT

Posted on 04/04/2017 8:25:42 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: righttackle44

Just like Fort Sumter, the bases belong to the US Federal Government.

However, GI’s stationed in California get overseas tour duty.


41 posted on 04/04/2017 9:18:42 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rivercat

[It would mean two more Republican Senators, not to mention the extra red state electors in the electoral college.]

It won’t take long for the Dems that were left in the blue part to be disgusted of the mess they made, and move to the “conservative” side. Except they will bring the same sh-tty politics and beliefs as the liberal end, resulting in another blue state.


42 posted on 04/04/2017 9:25:51 AM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012 ("Be quiet... you are #fakenews!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Exactly! They already have too much say in how the country is run. We’d be better off if they’d just go away.


43 posted on 04/04/2017 9:26:57 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
According to Wikipedia, Texas v. White (1869) ruled that secession was not allowed in the Constitution.

Interesting.

You do realize that if that assertion is true, then Lincoln was literally committing Treason by waging war on States, don't you?
That is probably the reason that no Confederate officer (military or civil) was charged with Treason: to do so would undermine the [stated/legal] justification for the Civil War.

44 posted on 04/04/2017 9:37:28 AM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Edward.Fish
You do realize that if that assertion is true, then Lincoln was literally committing Treason by waging war on States, don't you?

Maybe Lincoln saw it as enforcing Article IV Section 4?

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
Maybe Lincoln was getting ahead of the domestic violence caused by the seceding states going rogue?

If taking Article IV Section 4 literally, then Lincoln would not expect a seceding state to "apply" for "protection."

On the other hand, Lincoln may have seen it as "guaranteeing to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government..." If the logic of Madison's letters (see my linked post in post 32) is accepted, then the right to secede is simultaneously a right for other states to oust an undesirable state. When states have the right to gang up on other states, then the republican form of government breaks down.

-PJ

45 posted on 04/04/2017 10:00:24 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
The other counties of the Central Valley despise the coastal counties and would be likely to join Jefferson.

A conservative state with traditional American values.

But then, guess where all the a-holes in L.A. and S.F. would move to after they retired. Just like they did in Oregon and Washington.

They should think about splitting as well. Portland and Seattle out vote the rest of the state.

46 posted on 04/04/2017 10:02:14 AM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: boycott

If California left the Union, 49 or 56 other states would be pleased as punch to get rid of 55 electoral votes.

One tally relies upon traditional history, while the other number is based upon the lazy math of #44.


47 posted on 04/04/2017 10:07:53 AM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
For perspective, about 2/3 of the state is conservative. California, like New York, Illinois, North Carolina... are infested with libs in a couple of core cities.

 photo IMG_1030_zpsh3dzpxte.jpg

48 posted on 04/04/2017 10:12:17 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Maybe Lincoln saw it as enforcing Article IV Section 4?
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Did the State Legislatures apply for it? Did the State Executives?

If taking Article IV Section 4 literally, then Lincoln would not expect a seceding state to "apply" for "protection."

And yet that very application is needed to justify any action under Art. 4, Sec 4.

49 posted on 04/04/2017 10:14:14 AM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

However ....... 2 sections is not enough.

The top portion of CA is CONSERVATIVE - from the border of OR, until you get almost to Sacramento.

The middle portion of CA is UNTRA LIBERAL - from just above San Francisco, to just below Los Angeles.

The lower portion of CA is CONSERVATIVE - from just below Los Angeles, to the border of Mexico.


50 posted on 04/04/2017 10:25:04 AM PDT by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward.Fish
I recognize the catch-22 (anachronistic reference) that the violence-inciting state would not apply via Article IV. I also recognize the likelihood that the other states would not fear invasion from the seceding state if that state were left alone.

I would refer to my earlier argument that secession is extra-constitutional, and back that up with Madison's second letter (found at the linked post from my earlier post 32. In that letter, Madison says that the Constitution conferred citizenship in the United States on the citizens of the several states. Once conferred, the state legislatures did not have the authority to revoke citizenship in the United States on the citizens of their own state. That citizenship became a natural right of the individual.

So it's possible that Lincoln felt he was protecting citizens of the United States held hostage (if you will) by the governments of the seceding states. In this case, an act of Congress might be needed under Article I Section 8: "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions..." The seceding states would be considered an insurrection with United States citizens held hostage, and Congress can call up the militia and place them under the command of the Commander-In-Chief.

-PJ

51 posted on 04/04/2017 10:32:47 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Break this state in two right at the San Luis Obispo / Monterey county line.

North California will be solid blue state. South California will be a purple state. Take away LA County, it probably goes red.


52 posted on 04/04/2017 10:44:38 AM PDT by Angels27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
(California)...it’s very badly run.

Classic British Understatement.

53 posted on 04/04/2017 10:54:30 AM PDT by ChicagahAl (Stay safe out there. The< Haters (TM) are dangerous. Very dangerous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angels27

Monterey is south of Frisco...we don’t want them.

Look at the map of Jefferson further up thread. That is where the division should be.


54 posted on 04/04/2017 1:36:54 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson