Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedumb2003; RummyChick

All SCOTUS would have to do is read the 14th Amendment and the recorded Congressional debate that went along with it. It would be clear that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is meant to deny citizenship to what we now call Anchor Babies.

Of course, you’d need a textually oriented SCOTUS to bring this before, and the right test case. Libs would scream, because it would block their plan to import reliably Left clients and future voters.


9 posted on 04/12/2017 11:23:33 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine

>>Of course, you’d need a textually oriented SCOTUS to bring this before, and the right test case. Libs would scream, because it would block their plan to import reliably Left clients and future voters.<<

Once rgb claims her final reward (be that what it may), we might have that SCOTUS.


12 posted on 04/12/2017 11:47:55 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Not tired of winning yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson