Y’know, an ounce of lead administered to the back of the head at approx. mach one is a quick, painless death.
Go to the plant nursery and pick up a bottle of BLACK LEAF 40. Injected, it will put down a 700 lb horse in six seconds.
Fine, no executions by lethal injection of drugs.
However, we here in Texas can surely find a way to execute murderers - say, by instantaneous airborne lead poisoning. It is even quicker than the series of injections, and the pain (if felt at all) is over very, very quickly.
This is just too much BS from the FDA. It has nothing to do with “approved” drugs, and everything to do with activist socialist-democrats embedded within the FDA.
If Texas actually goes along with this fed BS, then so he it.
There’s other perfectly fine methods of execution that do not require FDA approval.
Those would include: firing squad, gas chamber, hanging, guillotine, and the electric chair. All have a proven 100% mortality rate, while being cost effective. And none of them require FDA approval.
Dry nitrogen gas is dirt cheap, readily available, doesn’t expire, is non-toxic, and is 100% lethal.
The drug received no complaints from any of their former customers...
ALL the states which will ACTUALLY EXECUTE a death penalty prisoner need to switch over to firing squad or hanging.
$10 worth of ammo would buy at least 4 executions.
IF they need a donation- I would send $$$.
California has over 750 people on ‘Death Row’, where they have NO intention of killing them. Some have been there for over 35 years. Their victims didn’t get such a life. Neither should they. The costs of keeping these people prisoners with all the extra guards is something that every state should disclose to the public.
Then perhaps this crap will cease & executions can resume.
Patriots are reminded the following. The Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, evidently a good place to hide these clauses from Congress (sarc), to clarify that all federal legislative / regulatory powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, or in non-elected bureaucrats running constitutionally undefined federal regulatory agencies like the EPA, IRS and FDA.
In other words, Congress has a constitutional “monopoly” on federal legislative powers whether it wants it or not imo.
But by letting faceless bureaucrats get away with exercising federal regulatory powers, powers that appear to be reasonably based on Congress’s Commerce Clause powers (1.8.3) in this case, members of Congress are once again wrongly protecting their voting records by letting non-elected bureaucrats get away with exercising federal regulatory powers.
Career lawmakers allow this to happen probably so that they can fool low-information voters, voters who aren’t familiar with the Constitution’s Sections 1-3 referenced above, into reelecting them.
By wrongly ignoring its constitutional responsibilities with respect to exercising its unique legislative powers, corrupt Congress is ultimately weakening voting power by letting bureaucrats get away with doing Congress’s unpopular work for it imo.
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November ’18 !
Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist Supreme Court justices off of the bench.
In fact, if Justice Gorsuch turns out to be a liberal Trojan Horse then we will need 67 patriot senators to remove a House-impeached Gorsuch from office.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February ‘18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
While I Googled the primary information above concerning Iowa and New Hampshire, FReeper iowamark brought to my attention that the February primaries for these states apply only to presidential election years. And after doing some more scratching, since primary dates for most states for 2018 elections probably haven’t been uploaded at this time (March 14, 2017), FReepers will need to find out primary dates from sources and / or websites in their own states.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed below.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Patriots are reminded the following. The Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, evidently a good place to hide these clauses from Congress (sarc), to clarify that all federal legislative / regulatory powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, or in non-elected bureaucrats running constitutionally undefined federal regulatory agencies like the EPA, IRS and FDA.
In other words, Congress has a constitutional “monopoly” on federal legislative powers whether it wants it or not imo.
But by letting faceless bureaucrats get away with exercising federal regulatory powers, powers that appear to be reasonably based on Congress’s Commerce Clause powers (1.8.3) in this case, members of Congress are once again wrongly protecting their voting records by letting non-elected bureaucrats get away with exercising federal regulatory powers.
Career lawmakers allow this to happen probably so that they can fool low-information voters, voters who aren’t familiar with the Constitution’s Sections 1-3 referenced above, into reelecting them.
By wrongly ignoring its constitutional responsibilities with respect to exercising its unique legislative powers, corrupt Congress is ultimately weakening voting power by letting bureaucrats get away with doing Congress’s unpopular work for it imo.
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November ’18 !
Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist Supreme Court justices off of the bench.
In fact, if Justice Gorsuch turns out to be a liberal Trojan Horse then we will need 67 patriot senators to remove a House-impeached Gorsuch from office.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February ‘18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
While I Googled the primary information above concerning Iowa and New Hampshire, FReeper iowamark brought to my attention that the February primaries for these states apply only to presidential election years. And after doing some more scratching, since primary dates for most states for 2018 elections probably haven’t been uploaded at this time (March 14, 2017), FReepers will need to find out primary dates from sources and / or websites in their own states.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed below.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Weaponized government. If the Left does not want their Little Brown Brothers executed for their crimes, they will use every single tentacle of government to stop it. Including the FDA. Those FDA agents should hang as accessories to whatever crime the perp committed who won’t get executed because the FDA seized the drug.