Posted on 05/02/2017 8:50:12 AM PDT by rhett october
On April 24, 2017 Seth Drayer and Dr. David Sanders debated the question, "Is abortion a moral injustice?" Mr. Drayer presented the affirmative case and Dr. Sanders presented the negative case.
During a public debate at Purdue University, Dr. David Sanders, associate professor of biology at Purdue, was in the middle of a rebuttal to abortion activist Seth Drayer‘s opening statement when he unexpectedly leveled child pornography charges at Drayer’s organization, Created Equal.
“He thinks fetuses are children, and he belongs to an organization that likes to show images of fetuses – and that’s something that’s a trademark,” Sanders began. “What would you call the public display of a butt-naked body of a child? I would call that child pornography.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJQeGh8gsgg
Oh, the hatred is great in this one!
“What would you call the public display of a butt-naked body of a child?”
He admitted it was the body of a child.
Impossible. They have told us a zillion times, a ‘fetus’ is not a ‘child’, so there................
“So....this pro-abortion professor is admitting that what is inside of a pregnant mother is a child? “
Needs to be repeated!
ha ha -
you are right- so much for this “professor” he
admits it is a child- the sad part- he wishes to KILL
these innocent children
Sanders is a nut case. I live in Lafayette In.
Wait, so those blobs of cells are now children?!?
What else has he done. I know he had something to do with the Ebola situation a while back. He seems really immature (the only word that I can think of) for this accusation of child porn....especially since he and others like him have built their argument on what is inside of a pregnant woman NOT being a child. Using debate tactics like that shows that even he sees his position and logic is weak.
Maybe he’s more familiar with child pornography than we realize.
Sanders is a lowly associate professor at Purdue but a loud Democrat
It’s funny but you’d think a biologist could tell where life lies
He’s probably tenured though
His religion is humanism of course
A clear sign of desperation.
So politics has not only blinded him but is his chief motivation. He bends biology for a political position/ideology.
So it is a human child afterall!
Never ending hipocrites
“child”?
So he admits abortion is murder?
Why isn’t that the headline?
“child”?
So he admits abortion is murder?
Why isn’t that the headline?
The baby is covering itself in every pic I’ve seen in Pro-life videos.
I’m not a lawyer, but I think to be child porn the image needs to be intended to have a certain sexual arousal effect on the average viewer.
Such photos are certainly not intended to arouse sexual interest but are more intended to make people think about what a fetus is.
Is the good pro-abort professor admitting the pictures are arousing to him?
Within a clinical medical context, parts are parts. Not pornography.
what a tool.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.