My Message to Republicans: Don’t Fall for Media Tricks on Comey

RUSH: You people that voted for Donald Trump, you’re just every day seeing why you did it. I have a message for the Republicans: The last thing you should do is find anything in common with the Democrats on this. The last thing you should do is feel sorry, simpatico. Do not fall for the temptation to join the Democrats in their rants against Trump on this. Here’s the deal, folks. There is no collusion. The Russians did not hack, did not tamper, did not impact the outcome of our election. It’s been established for over nine months, if not longer.

It’s not possible. There is not a single person anywhere in law enforcement, in Congress — there’s nobody officially anywhere — who can show you a syllable of evidence that whatever the Russians did had anything to do with the outcome of the election. There is nothing. And yet, it’s the only thing the Democrats have. They dare not let go of it. It’s the only explanation they have for why Hillary Clinton lost the election — and in that, is a tremendous opportunity for the Republicans.

Do you realize what a nothing burger the Democrat Party is? Do you realize the Democrat Party literally has nothing virtuous, positive, uplifting to run on? In all of this, the Democrat Party dares not ask people, “Hey, take a look at us. We got better ideas. Hey, take a look at us. We can fix this.” None of that. The only thing they’ve got is this insane, invisible, nonexistent, so-called connection between the Russians and our election. They have no ideas. They have no optimism. They have no leaders. They have no vision. They are ripe for being smoked for generations! This is the time to move in politically and wipe them out.

RUSH: I checked the email during the break. Don’t misunderstand here, folks. I’m not saying the Democrats don’t pose a threat. I’m not… Look, two things here. The Democrats are in deep trouble, electorally. The Democrats are not running the left; the media is. And the media is clearly not inconsequential. Don’t misunderstand. I’m not saying that what’s happening here is obviously to everyone. I’m saying the Republican Party has a golden opportunity here to continue to hammer the nail into the coffin of the Democrat Party.

The media stands in the way, obviously. But I’m just telling you, this kind of irrational hate — this all-consuming hate and derangement, delusion — it isn’t healthy. The majority of the American people do not want their politics, day to day, to be governed by this stuff. If they did, we wouldn’t be living with circumstances as we are now. We’ve got a big row to hoe. I don’t want to be misunderstood. But this instance, this episode that’s happened here, Comey being fired; Trump doing it?

It does not… It is not anything the Democrats or the media are trying to say that it is. It’s justified. I see if you want complain about the timing. It was long overdue. There’s no coup here. There’s no constitutional crisis whatsoever. None of these allegations the Democrats are making about this or the media have any substance whatsoever. Not saying that they can’t make people believe this. I know better than everybody that they can. I just don’t want the Republicans to get sucked into this and start talking and acting like the Democrats are.

And the reason they would do it is why they always do it: a misunderstanding of the public mood, a misunderstanding of thinking that the Democrats and the media represent the majority of thinking in this country. And I’m here to tell you, they don’t. It might be close, but they don’t. That’s part of the trick every day in the media, is to make it look like everything they’re reporting and saying about it and believe represents the vast majority of thinking. And anything that’s not that is extremist, filled with hate, or is racist or nativist or whatever.

And the Republicans have a golden opportunity here if they just don’t fall for this. But you know, the Republicans are part of the establishment too. Some Republicans are. And the enmity that people hold for Trump inside Washington is only ratcheting up. And, in fact, even in that regard, Trump is — you have to say — fearless. They had to know what was gonna happen here. You know what you ought to do? I did this. You need to go read some of the reaction to this within the first five minutes of it.

Within the first five minutes, go read some blogs, conservative blogs. Go read some conservative websites. You know what you’ll find? You’ll find unanimity in support of Trump. Well, not unanimous but it’s overwhelmingly. The case they make is Trump was totally justified. This was long overdue. Comey had long ago ceased behaving appropriately for an FBI director. The immediate analysis was how Trump was justified, quoting Rosenstein over at the Department of Justice, the number two there behind Jeff Sessions.

His memo is explicitly perfect and clear in detailing why this happened. The initial analysis of this was that Trump was home free, had concrete to stand on, not just firm ground. Ten minutes or 15 minutes after the media gets hold of it and totally changes all the narratives, is when people begin reacting to that and not the actual news. What I’m saying is: Don’t react to the media’s coverage of this. React to the actual event. And the actual event, the firing of Comey is entirely, completely justified.

A case can be made for it, as many Democrats have been. There’s hypocrisy galore out there (and I know hypocrisy never sticks to the Democrats). I’ve got a page here of tweets and complaints by Democrats. “Nancy Pelosi Says Comey May Not Be ‘in the Right Job.'” All of this is within the past three months. “Harry Reid: ‘Comey should resign.'” “CNN’s Top Legal Analyst Paul Callan: ‘Time for FBI Chief Comey to Resign.'” “Since the FBI Found that Hillary Clinton Broke the Law, Recommend Charges or Resign,” Change.org.

So, in other words, Comey should go. Wall Street Journal: “Comey Should Resign.” Business Insider: “‘Comey Acted in an Outrageous Way During the Campaign’: Bernie Sanders Suggests FBI Director Should Resign.” ThinkProgress!. This is the Democrat, Hillary Clinton site. ThinkProgress is their place. That’s where Podesta worked. “The Case for Firing Comey.” Podesta’s out there saying that the American people “are getting nauseous at the sound of Comey’s voice.” They’ve been mad at Comey ever since July 5th. Now all of a sudden Trump fires him?

So I’m saying react to the event, folks — and when you react to the event, you have nothing to defend, you have nothing to feel guilty about, you have nothing to defend Trump over. It’s entirely justified. It’s entirely legitimate. It’s not a coup. It’s not the Saturday Night Massacre. It’s not Nixonian. It’s none of that. It isn’t even close to that. Nixon never fired an FBI director. The only guy that fired an FBI director is who? Anybody know in there? That’d be William Jefferson Clinton, and the FBI director he fired was named Bill Sessions.

And that was such a fiasco, we produced a parody and satire bit about it. Clinton was being urged by the media. Clinton was — and everybody says, “Well, that was then. Didn’t get much news. Sessions should have been fired.” No! It occupied the media for two weeks! It was such a big deal that we did a parody about it, with Clinton dreaming (impression), “Must fire Bill Sessions. Must fire Bill Sessions. Must fire Bill Sessions.” Was dreaming it, because the media was the hammering. “You gotta get rid of Bill Sessions!” I don’t even remember what for.

But the media was demanding that Sessions go, and Clinton finally did it. And there was no talk of a coup, and there was no talk of a constitutional crisis, and there was no talk of anything negative about Clinton. Nixon got rid of Archibald Cox. Archibald Cox was special prosecutor, independent counsel looking into Watergate. He ordered Cox to quit; Cox said, “Screw you! I’m not quitting.” Cox said, “No, I’m not quitting. Screw you.” So Nixon called somebody and said, “Fire Cox.” The guy Nixon called second, refused to fire Cox.

“Screw you.” So Nixon fired that guy. The solicitor general, the guy that represents the United States Supreme Court. Robert Bork replaced the fired solicitor general and went over and fired Cox. That happened on a Saturday in the early seventies. I was in Pittsburgh. I remember this ’cause the program director of the station where I worked called me to come in ’cause we might not have a show to do Monday. They thought the country was gonna fall apart because of this.

I’m not kidding you. I’m 22 years old. I’m saying, “What?” “Yeah, man! The Saturday Night Massacre. Nixon’s going nuts. You gotta get in here. We need everybody at the station in case they close the city off.” “Are you kidding me?” “No. Get in here.” So we go in there Saturday night because of the Saturday Night Massacre. Bork got rid of Cox. That was it, and it didn’t save Nixon. Nixon wasn’t doing a coup. Nixon was president. Trump’s not doing a coup. He is president.

Leaders don’t mount coups! Leaders have coups mounted against them, which is what is happening here.

The timeline for Comey starts WAYYYY before 2016. I’m about to drop several dozen red pills at once. Brace yourselves, I’m going in dry:
Part 1/2
TL;DR Comey has been a Clinton puppet since he’s mattered, and any positive post you saw about him was most likely a Sharia Blue post.
To understand Comey and his career of working with corruption and working for the Clinton’s, we have to go back to 2001, when Bill Clinton pardoned Marc Rich. Stick with me, I promise it will be worth it.
Who is Marc Rich?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Rich
Marc Rich was born December 18, 1934 and died on June 26, 2013. He was a businessmen, his focus was in banking and trade commodities.
Rich founded the commodities trading giant Glencore. Today it is the World’s 3rd largest family business, and the 10th largest company on the Fortune Global 500 list. It has headquarters in Switzerland, London, the Netherlands, and Jersey. As well subsidiaries all around the globe. Without a doubt its primary interests are oil, gas, and mining.
Marc Rich was indicted in the United States in 1983 with business partner Picnus Green and fled the country.
What did Marc Rich do?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/27/business/marc-rich-pardoned-financier-dies-at-78.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytimes&_r=0 https://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/jun/26/marc-rich-commodities-trader-fugitive-dies?INTCMP=SRCH
Marc Rich and Pincus Green were indicted on 65 criminal counts including: tax evasion, wire fraud, racketeering, and trading with Iran during the 1973-1974 Oil Embargo, when Rich used contacts in Iran and Iraq to circumvent the sanctions.
In his own biography, and to his biographer Daniel Amann, Rich said his “most important and most profitable” business deals happened by violating international trade embargoes and doing business with the apartheid regime of South Africa.
Rich admitted to doing business with: Apartheid South Africa, Fidel Castro’s Cuba, Marxist Angola, the Nicaraguan Sandinistas, Gaddafi’s Libya, Ceausescu’s Romania, and Pinochet’s Chile. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_Credit_and_Commerce_International#American_inquiries_and_legal_actions
Rich was also believed to be involved with the Bank of Credit and Commerce International: a bank which was closed down for laundering money for people such as Saddamm Hussein, Manuel Noriega, and the Medellin Cartel and the terrorist group Abu Nidal. Rich was even reported to have been involved in arms deals in Iraq in the 1980s.
Okay, that’s who Marc Rich was. By why is that important?
Marc Rich was pardoned by President Bill Clinton on January 20, 2001, hours before leaving office, in what the New York Times would call one of history’s most “flagrant abuses of presidential power.”
Why was Rich’s pardon so bad?
Long story short? Rich bought his pardon. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/pardoned-financier-marc-rich-dead-at-78/
Rich funneled $1 million to the Democratic party, including more than $100,000 to Hillary Clinton’s Senate Campaign in New York, and $450,000 to the Clinton Library foundation.
It was arguably the most controversial moment of Clinton’s presidency. He went on to defend it, even citing the arguments of another controversial pardon receiver, one “Scooter” Libby. http://legaltimes.typepad.com/files/121908-jamescomey.pdf
Then Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder argued for Rich’s pardon. Eric Holder was Obama’s first Attorney General and also had a deep hand in Fast & Furious.
The pardon of Marc Rich was so controversial there was a federal hearing on it. It was originally prosecuted by Federal Prosecutor Mary Jo White, but she stepped down and was replaced by (HERE IT COMES) the current director of the FBI James Comey (DUN DUN DUNNNN!), who ultimately found “No evidence of criminal activity.” According to the Washington Post. http://nypost.com/2001/03/27/brits-seize-2-million-bound-for-marc-rich/
Just more evidence of Rich’s drug ties.
The Clinton Pardons/Drug ties of People involved
Now, Marc Rich hard long standing ties to terrorist organizations and the drug trade.
For a moment, I want to focus on the latter, and not the former. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/26/us/roger-clinton-s-dogged-effort-for-drug-trafficker.html?ref=topics
Clinton considered pardoning a known drug trafficker after a man, one Tommy Gambino, approached Clinton’s brother Roger Clinton on a golf course, handed him a rolex watch and had a conversation about presuading his brother to do so.
Roger Clinton’s efforts to get Rosario Gambino pardoned were so persistent the FBI investigated them. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/23/us/clinton-pardons-brothers-siblings-who-often-emerge-unflattering-spotlight.html
Roger has a long history of involvment in cocaine. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/04/hillary-clinton-brothers-hugh-tony-rodham-116674
But Roger also received a pardon for cocaine conviction. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/hillary-clinton-hugh-tony-rodham
Hugh Rodham, Hillary Clinton’s brother, received $434,000 to lobby for a pardon of a cocaine trafficker, and he did so successfully. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
Now, some may say it’s disingenous to say Eric Holder has drug ties. But he is tied to the late Marc Rich, and we should all remember the time he helped facilitate the transfer of firearms to Mexican Drug Cartels. http://www.hsbc.com/news-and-insight/media-resources/media-releases/2013/former-us-deputy-attorney-general-joins-hsbc-board
Current FBI Director James Comey sat on the board of banking giant HSBC. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/outrageous-hsbc-settlement-proves-the-drug-war-is-a-joke-20121213
The same Banking Giant that launders drug cartel money. And has been caught, charged and fined for doing so. https://investments.hsbc.co.uk/news/company/24989264/glencore-gallops-higher-as-liberum-bullish-on-china-s-coal-policy
HSBC is also responsible for many of Glencore’s investments. Again, Glencore was founded by the criminal Marc Rich, who paid for a pardon by former President Bill
Clinton. A pardon which was investigated by James Comey, who sat on the board of HSBC, which laundered drug cartel money, and did business with a company that worked intimately with drug traffickers. Comey found “No evidence of criminal activity.”
Okay, so Glencore, the Clinton’s, HSBC, the director the FBI are somehow all linked to eachother and to drug cartels. So what? Where does this lead.
Okay, now this is where things begin to get a little technical, and more questions have to get answered.
Who is John Podesta, and what is Joule Unlimited? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Podesta John Podesta is the Chariman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. He also was the Counselor to the President for Barack Obama, the White House Chief of Staff for Bill Clinton, and he also https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4635
Owns 75,000 shares of an energy company known as Joule Unlimited Technologies, Inc. Who or what is Joule Unlimited Technologies, Inc?
I’m glad you asked. http://www.jouleunlimited.com/ Joule Unlimited is another comodities trading giant, founded by Noubar Afeyan, and has a certain Russian Politician on it’s board.
One Anatoly Chubais https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoly_Chubais
Chubais of course, being a Russian politician, works for Vladimir Putin http://www.newsweek.com/whats-behind-putin-shuffle-kremlin-453675
Chubais actually invited Putin to St. Petersburg in 1996. http://www.jouleunlimited.com/joule-audi
Joule Unlimited Partners with Audi. Which is owned by Volkswagen.
Let’s talk terrorism http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-28/qatar-fund-stands-to-lose-5-9-billion-on-vw-glencore-stakes
Volkswagen, via it’s stake holders in Qatar, is intimately tied with, that’s right, none other than Glencore. http://english.aawsat.com/2011/05/article55246399/alwaleed-kingdom-invest-400-mln-in-glencore-ipo http://www.wsj.com/articles/cobalts-luck-could-come-from-volkswagen-glencore-troubles-1444055689
Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed(Remember the one that was mean to Trump?) invested $400 million into Glencore’s IPO in 2011.
Why are the Saudi’s, Qatar, and the Democrats interested in Glencore? Short Answer? Terroism and money. Long answer? Terrorism and money. http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Glencore-Seeks-To-Offset-Weak-Year-With-Iran-Libya-Oil-Trading.html
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/apr/21/glencore-trade-iran-supplier-nuclear
http://www.iraq-businessnews.com/tag/glencore/
http://time.com/4055466/glencore/
http://m.4-traders.com/GLENCORE-PLC-8017494/news/Glencore-Yemen-crude-exports-resume-at-a-trickle-from-Ash-Shihr-Oil-Terminal-22861238/ Glencore is a trading company. They trade lots of things.
Once Gadaffi fell in 2011, they began trading Libyan oil again.
They trade Yemen’s oil
They trade Iraqi oil.
Once the Iran deal was hitched, they began trading Iranian copper.
In 2012 and 2013, they were caught trading aluminum to Iran’s nuclear program(which was against international law at the time).
And as Time reads, government policy since 2008(Gee what happened in 2008? Hmm) has made it so Glencore could sit back and make “EASY MONEY” https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/786646253358768128
Wikileaks has shown us Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Glencore investors TIED to Joule Unlimited and John Podesta, and thus in multiple directions James Comey, The Clintons, and the democrats, fund ISIS. And Qatar Gave Bill Clinton $1 million for a 5 minute meeting in 2011
$1 million for a five minute meeting in 2011? Didn’t Gadaffi fall in 2011? Didn’t Saudi Arabia invest $400 million into Glencore in 2011? Didn’t Glencore begin trading Libyan Oil in 2011?
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
permalinkembed

[–]IM_NOT_CIA_PROMISE 43 points 2 hours ago
Part 2/2
Does it go deeper? See above
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/11/us/politics/keystone-pipeline.html https://agmetalminer.com/2015/11/04/glencore-says-its-debt-will-fall-obama-will-rule-on-keystone-xl/
What’s that? Glencore is tied to the Keystone Pipeline?
Okay, let’s slow down and take a step back. So Glencore is evil. But what does that REALLY have to do with Hillary Clinton? Where’s the connection?
Right under our noses.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-04/goldman-sued-monopolizing-us-aluminum-warehousing-market http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-12/spot-goldman-and-glencore-aluminum-warehouses https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/role-of-hillary-clintons-brother-in-haiti-gold-mine-raises-eyebrows/2015/03/20/c8b6e3bc-cc05-11e4-a2a7-9517a3a70506_story.html
Goldman Sachs, Glencore, and Tony Rodham((Weird how they’re all tied to Hillary)) have shady, shady mining deals http://www.northkoreatimes.com/index.php/sid/233981609
Glencore is still working with North Korea. They are trying to have an aluminum monopoly in the US, and have been busted selling aluminum to the Iranian nuclear program...are they funding the North Korean one as well? https://www.fastmarkets.com/base-metals-news/asia/focus-china-looks-north-korea-plug-glencore-zinc-concs-gap/
Glencore’s chinese section, Xtrata, has deep ties to heavy metal mining and North Korea, including aluminum and nickel http://af.reuters.com/article/sudanNews/idAFLDE76B1Q420110712
Glencore also benefits from trading Sudanese Oil. They sure have no problem showing up where human rights violations occur https://www.wfp.org/content/un-agency-buys-377-million-australian-wheat-glencore
Glencore gets mining contracts in North Korea via China, and gets to sell food futures to North Korea via the United Nations. It’s amazing how centered around Glencore the world’s elite actually are.
https://books.google.com/books?id=-6fIe0gpgicC&pg=PA229&lpg=PA229&dq=glencore+north+korea&source=bl&ots=ufY7oGQDyA&sig=82ZS4T9chpPed3JLpqfr63GqDKU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiRtM-uttrPAhWqhVQKHSF0DLo4ChDoAQhZMAk#v=onepage&q=glencore%20north%20korea&f=false
The success of Glencore is directly tied to the success of the Chinese government. Note how Trump wants to be tougher on China, but Clinton does not. https://ramumine.wordpress.com/tag/glencore-xstrata/
Remember the Honduran coup? Guess which company benefitted from Hillary’s mucking about in Honduras? That’s right, Glencore. Okay, so for years Glencore has been benefiting from Hillary’s foriegn policy. But how does Hillary Benefit from Glencore? Let’s move to Canada for a bit, shall we? https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2016/08/19/clinton-foundation-ban-would-not-apply-some-related-charities/iuVtc828bEjGWfjgSxJZ5M/story.html
The Canadian branch of the Clintons, The Clinton-Giustra Enterprise, which accepts money from the same mining industry the Clinton’s have been linked to, the same mining industry benefiting from all of Hillary and Bill’s foreign policy ‘blunders’ over the years, would not be excluded, and certainly have not been so far, from being tied to her. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/1100-donors-to-a-canadian-charity-tied-to-clinton-foundation-remain-secret/2015/04/28/c3c0f374-edbc-11e4-8666-a1d756d0218e_story.html
The Clinton-Giustra Enterprise has SECRET DONORS, which are largely from the Mining/Commodity industry, which has been the beneficiary of ALL OF CLINTON’S ACTIONS http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/canadian-charity-linked-with-clinton-foundation-defends-high-costs-1.2980962
The Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Charity has extremely high costs, with extremely low return. Seems like a great way to launder money into yourself
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-clintons-a-luxury-jet-and-their-100-million-donor/2015/05/03/688051d0-ecef-11e4-8abc-d6aa3bad79dd_story.html Giustra, a mining billionaire, sources donations in Canada from his crooked friends for Crooked Hillary. http://nypost.com/2016/01/17/after-pardoning-criminal-marc-rich-clintons-made-millions-off-friends/
There you have it folks. A Massive money laundering scheme spanning from US to Asia to the Middle East and back to Canada, in order for the Clinton’s and pals to get around international law with Comey playing Center Defense.
(general note note: big parts of this post sourced from older post here https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/57kfuo/stop_looking_over_this_read_it_odin_it_is_hard/)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.