Wow, who would have thought there was one? I thought it was a bunch of overgrown children throwing temper tantrums and crap at the wall to see what sticks.
None of the Trump critics i talk to are worried there is no scandal.
There’s always hillary-IRS-Fast&furious-Benghazi.....
The Trump Admin is NOT in crisis! The NeverTrumpers are in crisis.
We are currently experiencing a coup attempt that seeks to remove a sitting president. Not an impeachment but a coup.
First rule of staging a coup is that you better not fail!The coup is failing!
When this coup attempt dies, which it is, Trump will know by name who the traitors are and Trump does not forget. We will know very soon who the traitors are and many will go to jail.
Just the facts folks!
The Libtards will never let this go.
If the Special Counsel gives President Trump a clean bill of health the democrats will scream that the fix is in and that Robert Mueller has been corrupted by Trump and Putin.
This whole Russki “collusion” myth is a creation of the Obama/Clintoon “Deep State”. I checked under my bed and all of my closets and found no Russkis anywhere.
https://oig.justice.gov/press/2017/2017-01-12.pdf
Thing people keep missing. It might just be Comey,and the Obama White House, not Trump, who is the focus of the special council
There's a thought I've had for the past few weeks, as world leaders seem to genuinely enjoy their meetings with Trump. Maybe most world leaders across the globe are quite happy to have President Trump, who wants peace instead of toppling them and destabilizing their countries.
Careful what you wish for?
The Donks will just make up another crisis. Fake But Accurate.
The the progressives/RATs/MSM cabal has squandered it’s credibility and won’t regain it for years. Watch for major collapsing in the homo-ginned-ized news media
Mueller was the FBI head when Russia informed us TWICE about the perps whom we—Obama and Mueller—chose to ignore.
http://jaytaylormedia.com/missing-evidence-of-prior-fbi-relationship-with-boston-bomber/ :
Ever since the early days of the Boston Marathon bombing investigation, it’s been commonly understood that Tamerlan Tsarnaev first came to the attention of the FBI thanks to a March 2011 “warning” from the FSB, Russia’s security services.
We now know this to be false. In a little-noticed exchange during congressional testimony, the FBI’s then-director Robert Mueller admitted that the Bureau had an interest in the elder Tsarnaev before Russia’s warning. That crucial admission has somehow become buried over time, and the government has been only too happy to leave it out of sight.
What else is the Bureau hiding—and what is the truth behind this subterfuge?
Implausible Deniability
The record shows that the FBI has repeatedly flip-flopped on this matter, but the significance of this curious behavior has escaped the scrutiny of the traditional media.
In fact, it turns out that Tamerlan Tsarnaev came to the FBI’s attention at least twice prior to Russia’s March 2011 warnings.
Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), while questioning Mueller about Russia’s warning to the FBI regarding Tamerlan asked: “Did you have domestic information on Tamerlan prior to that—prior to that [March 2011] date?”
“ I don’t believe so,” Mueller responded.
“Pardon me?” King pressed.
“Wait, wait, wait,” Mueller stammered, “His name had come up in two other cases.” He went on to say that Tamerlan’s name came up regarding cases of other individuals which were subsequently closed.
“So it’s reasonable that the letter of March 4, 2011 refocused the FBI on Tamerlan?” King continued.
“Absolutely,” Mueller admitted.
Not to worry you establishment pukes and other DC libturds, Mueller will get handled by the ruling elite’s deep state servants and he will be left no option other than to comply with their offer/threat. It worked so well to rid themselves of JFK and it worked so well under the Clintons time in the WH that it’s just accepted now that that is how the 5th column’s/NOW elites control of the DC system works.
This author’s premise is off in several places. First, “Trump’s firing of Comey to attempt to quash the inquiry” has already been debunked, under oath before the Senate, by acting FBI director Andy McCabe, who stated that the FBI was never pressured to do any such thing. (McCabe is a lefty btw).
Second, the timing: the NY Times on Jan. 23 reported that the FBI had “closed its investigation” into Lt Gen. Michael Flynn’s calls with the Russian ambassador, after determining there was no illicit activity. So why would Trump request Comey to drop a probe that already had been closed?
Third, if Comey did memorialize the purported Trump pressure at his Feb 14 meeting, why did he testify to the Senate May 3, answering a direct question, that “never in my experience” had anyone asked him to quash any investigation.
This author, to use a popular phrase, is too smart for his own good. He takes snippets of easily contradicted claims and fashions them into something resembling fact.
This whole "special counsel" thing has all the earmarks of a brilliant maneuver by Trump to (a) shut up the non-stop hysteria from the press and (b) ensure that some real ugly truths that a lot of those in power would prefer to bury will surface as a result and in a manner that Trump's DoJ can be "surprised" by the revelations and "forced" to take action.
Expect fireworks in the Fall.
Let’s remind ourselves about the Nixon impeachment timeline:
By the time and independent counsel was appointed concerning Watergate, there had been many arrests, indictments, and convictions, along with resignations by White House staff.
In Watergate, there were proven crimes. The question was whether they were connected to the president. Here and now, we have no proven crimes, making a Special Counsel entirely premature. The premature nature of a Counsel is certainly understood by the few remaining top Democrats who aren’t drug addled or retarded.
Special prosecutor can pivot on one question:
If the Russians were not spying on the Trump campaign, then who was?
Clinton and Obama should be very worried.