Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Helicondelta

Well.. if they go after Kushner, they then have to go after Hillary’s uranium deal with the Russians.
Reid’s solar plant deal with the Chinese..


7 posted on 05/26/2017 6:31:57 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare

What is the crime? Where is the statute? The only thing they could get him on is a perjury charge of some sort if he failed to disclose during an official interview.


21 posted on 05/26/2017 7:33:47 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare

Not to mention the Skolvoko deal. Russian oligarchs paid big money to the Clinton foundation, and paid Bill Clinton handsomely for a speech. Then, Hillary helped Russia develop a technology park (some call it the “Russian Silicon Valley”). Then she invited dozens of American technology companies - all or nearly all of whom were also donors to the Clinton foundation - to set up divisions in Skolvoko and transfer technology and know-how into a suburb of Moscow. Not long after, the FBI declared Skolvoko to be a vast Russian international espionage scheme in which American technology was stolen - industrial espionage.

Now, if Clinton were just the Secretary of State and fumbled her way into that mess, then perhaps the most we could say is that she is gullible and unfit for high office. But, because both sides of the deals have their nexus through the Clinton foundation, it raises suspicions that much higher. The inability and unwillingness to ‘follow the money’ by the media and law enforcement is astounding. The mere existence of such a scheme where a sitting Sec of State solicited and collected billions of dollars from autocrats, thugs, dictators, and industrialists is not only unprecedented, it is at best horribly unseemly. There used to be a time when leaders avoided the appearance of impropriety. But for some reason (and that reason is probably very scary) in this case it was not only ignored it was glorified as an international good.

And if there was any doubt about the sincerity, if the foundation truly were a wonderful worthwhile charity delivering supplies to the needy and destitute, then money would continue to flow in its direction regardless of who was running it. And yet, as soon as Hillary lost the election donations dried up and they essentially closed up shop. Of course people arranged these large donations because of a quid pro quo. They expected access, they expected favors, they expected to get rewarded on the back-end. And as long as Hillary was the SoS, and the presumptive Democrat nominee for President, and the expected successor to Obama, the money rolled in. The day that ambition died marks the day when donations ceased to materialize.

It is possible that the special prosecutor will end up investigating some of these kinds of dealings. He may not want to, and it may not be the reason for his appointment, but the witnesses could very easily force the issue open and lead him down such a road.


23 posted on 05/26/2017 11:40:27 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson