When the ENTIRE DC establishment and liberal media was screaming at Chris Ruddy to JUST SHUT THE HELL UP about Vince Foster, he soldiered on alone doggedly, totally undeterred.
60 Minutes slandered him, cutting up his video interview in 10 million ways until he seemed a total idiot to their viewing audience.
Along with WND at the time and several UK publications, Chris Ruddy STOOD ALONE against the Clintons; Drudge would only come later.
But THEN...?
He started talking and acting like a liberal.
I will never fully understand it.
In fact, I don’t understand it at all, even now.
Probably drugged by LIB asshats.
Wasn’t Newsmax sold to a different owner at some point?
Perhaps he was made an offer he couldn’t refuse.
Here’s where Ruddy began to change [link to it, worth reading the whole thing since it’s all tied to Obama and Syria] :
“According to John A. Shaw, the former deputy undersecretary for international technology security, Auchi not only helped Saddam prior to the war but also worked closely with the French bank BNP Paribas after combat ended, in order to acquire contracts inside Iraq…. “BNP Paribas has been linked to the UN Oil-for-Food scandal, with potentially billions of dollars missing, or misused by Saddam through the French bank.” The article soon disappeared from Newsmax. Then, on March 20, 2006, publisher Christopher Ruddy was photographed with Auchi at a London event sponsored by Auchi’s “Anglo-Arab Organization.” Speaking at the event, Ruddy criticized US conduct of the Iraq war for “entering international conflicts without the international support and the participation of many allies.” Ruddy continued, “The world is scared of the American power more than admiring its value; and the Democratic ideas that is spread by force, pressure and occupation of other nations….”
Since the meeting Newsmax coverage has shifted. A January 11, 2007 Newsmax column by Ruddy was titled, “Why I oppose the troop surge.” A 2008 Newsmax article describes Auchi as buying out Rezko’s interest in a Chicago development, “as negative information about Rezko came to light….” The 2008 article is now being used as a favorable media reference by Carter-Ruck attorneys. In contrast, Shaw’s 2008 writings are banished to Wikileaks. ....-————http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2283424/posts