To: ExGeeEye
The 10th doesn’t allow states to violate the 2nd. Or 1st, 4th,5th, or any other. In the Heller decision, the Supreme Court recognized a state's power to place reasonable restrictions on firearms. That makes it a 10th Amendment issue.
To: DoodleDawg
The Bill of Rights are rights afforded every person in the USA and is therefore not a states right issue.
The Heller decision should not interfere with reciprocity between states. In other words, the state that issues a permit is merely the paper holder for the weapon.
To: DoodleDawg
In the Dred Scott decision...
In Roe vs Wade...
15 posted on
06/25/2017 5:42:56 AM PDT by
ExGeeEye
(For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
To: DoodleDawg
Refusal to grant carry, or creating a permitting process that takes 1-2 years is not a “reasonable restriction” by any stretch of the imagination.
22 posted on
06/25/2017 6:26:34 AM PDT by
Axenolith
(Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson