Posted on 07/01/2017 6:21:23 AM PDT by SMGFan
I am extremely pleased to see that @CNN has finally been exposed as #FakeNews and garbage journalism. It's about time!
Me too, now to remove them from spreading their propaganda in public places such as air port and schools.
Mr. ZuckerNothingBurger needs to be shown the door.
Our Donald knocked off this nasty, lying bunch after just a few months in office.
Wonder what that number is?
This the power speaking truth. And the libs hate it.
You mean the “Cuck Zucker”?
CNN = Counterfeit News Network
aka, Crap News Network
Okay, Mr. President, remove CNN from press room and pool. Be done with them.
The public knew this!!
Now get that crap off the TV’s at the airports!!
He needs to revoke their WH press credentials. Then put Joe and Mika and Jim Acosta on the no fly list.
Remember when the MSM tried to pin the Fake News label on conservative outlets? Now it has been fully wrapped around their own necks.
Klintoon News Network ...
CNN has a long history of working with mass murdering dictators to create fake news about them versus real news about their terrible treatment of the poor people under them. CNN’s international Fake news enables evil dictators to stay in power and to kill their opponents!
CNN’s Fake International News is a killer!
CNN Journalist Governments Pay Us To Fake News, Shocking Exposé
November 26, 2016
According to Amber Lyon, a three-time Emmy award winning journalist, CNN is routinely paid by the US government and foreign governments to selectively report on certain events and make up fake news stories.
Furthermore, the Obama administration pay CNN for editorial control over some of their content.
Redflagnews.com report:
Back in March 2011, CNN sent a four person team to Bahrain to cover the Arab Spring. Once there, the crew was the subject of extreme intimidation amongst other things, but they were able to record some fantastic footage. As Glenn Greenwald of the UKs Guardian writes in his blockbuster article from September 4th 2012:
In the segment, Lyon interviewed activists as they explicitly described their torture at the hands of government forces, while family members recounted their relatives abrupt disappearances. She spoke with government officials justifying the imprisonment of activists. And the segment featured harrowing video footage of regime forces shooting unarmed demonstrators, along with the mass arrests of peaceful protesters.
In sum, the early 2011 CNN segment on Bahrain presented one of the starkest reports to date of the brutal repression embraced by the US-backed regime.
Despite these accolades, and despite the dangers their own journalists and their sources endured to produce it, CNN International (CNNi) never broadcast the documentary. Even in the face of numerous inquiries and complaints from their own employees inside CNN, it continued to refuse to broadcast the program or even provide any explanation for the decision. To date, this documentary has never aired on CNNi.
Having just returned from Bahrain, Lyon says she saw first-hand that these regime claims were lies, and I couldnt believe CNN was making me put what I knew to be government lies into my reporting.
Here is a segment of the Bahrain report that Amber Lyon and her team put together. CNNi refused to allow it to air because the Bahrain Government had paid them not to show it.
http://yournewswire.com/cnn-journalist-governments-pay-us-to-fake-stories-shocking-expose/
I assume Trump doesn’t give a damn that his tweets might interfere with Ryan’s plan for bringing civility to DC. Trump should call a joint press conference with Ryan and ask “Are you on my side on protecting the country from terrorists, voter fraud, stopping drugs from coming across the border? Things like that? And by the way, when did you start kissing Democrats’ asses?”
Another Fake News MMS Outlet, the NY Slimes is taking some big hits from our President and his backers.
New York Times Issues Correction for Russia Flap
Townhall.com ^ | June 30, 2017 | Courtney O’Brian
Posted on 6/30/2017, 11:03:53 AM by Kaslin
The New York Times has issued a correction four days too late for its flap of a Russia story Monday. In a piece entitled, “Trump’s Deflections and Denials on Russia Frustrate Even His Allies,” the editors published some inaccuracies. In particular, the writers suggested that 17 intelligence agencies had signed off on a report noting that Russia had interfered in the 2016 presidential election. In reality, only four had come to that conclusion.
In fact, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee exactly that last month.
“Only three agencies” were directly involved in the assessment, “plus my office,” Clapper told Sen. Al Franken (D-MN).
Obviously, the Times editors were briefed, because they released this correction Thursday.
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.
The Times was also recently forced to issue a correction for suggesting Sarah Palin had anything to do with the 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona, when Jared Lee Loughner targeted Democratic congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords.
That wasn’t enough for Palin - she is suing the paper.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ..
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3565505/posts
Yet, in just about every doctor or hospital's waiting room, or business with a television on for its customers, that is the station that is on, at least here in New York City. I find it impossible to sit there quietly without commenting and correcting the BS. Conversations with other customers clearly reveal that most people, again, at least here in NYC, know next to nothing about the issues. All they know is Trump bad, democrats good. Very unfortunate since these fools can vote.
I believe the government subsidizes a lot of crap that’s on the air and in print. How else could MSNBC stay on the air and NYT keep publishing.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
[excerpt]
O'REILLY: Fidel Castro, do you admire the man?
TURNER: Yes.
O'REILLY: Now he has murdered people. He's imprisoned people. There are political prisoners now. He won't let his people use the Internet. Nobody can use that. And you admire the guy?
TURNER: Well, I admire certain things about him. He's trained a lot of doctors, and they've got one of the best educational systems in the developing world. And you know, he's still popular with a lot of people down there. He's unpopular
O'REILLY: But he's a killer. He's a killer. He's a guy who
TURNER: But that has never, to my knowledge, that's never been proven. I mean
O'REILLY: He's executed political prisoners. I mean, he enslaves people who don't see it the way he sees it. Come on. He's a dictatorship. If you admire him, then why wouldn't you admire Mussolini? I mean, what's the difference? Mussolini put people back to work. There was order. The educational system was fine. See, I'm not getting this. This is what I don't understand about it.
TURNER: Well, OK, well, if you don't see the difference between Castro and Mussolini, you know, then you know, I likened some aspects of FOX News to the Nazis, so, I mean, you know, it works both ways.
O'REILLY: But you just admitted to me that that wasn't a very good thing to do and wasn't accurate.
TURNER: Hey, listen, I didn't say I wanted to live in Cuba. And I didn't say that I was buddy buddies with Fidel Castro. I just said that I respected certain things that he's done.
O'REILLY: All right, well
TURNER: What's wrong with that?
O'REILLY: Well, you said respect the man. And I just don't I can't possibly see how you could do that, but
TURNER: Of course not.
O'REILLY: Now I asked this question through one of my producers to Ms. Fonda. And I'm going to ask it to you because by reading your book, it struck me that the Vietnam experience changed you. I'm saying to myself, you know, Turner comes into the Vietnam era, conservative guy, pretty much traditional guy, it changes him.
TURNER: Yes.
O'REILLY: It changes him. And now he's a very liberal guy. So I asked Ms. Fonda, didn't it ever bother you that after all your activism and getting America out of Vietnam, which it subsequently did in the mid '70s, that 3 million human beings were slaughtered by the people that you were lionizing, the North Vietnam and the Khmer Rouge Communists who wouldn't have been slaughtered if we stayed. And their skulls were stacked on top of each other. And I never heard from you, Jane Fonda. And I never heard a word from Ted Turner about that. And that, to me, is a good question.
TURNER: You've got me. I didn't really think about it. You know, it didn't make the news very much.
O'REILLY: No, it didn't. And you had a vehicle that you could have had the revisionist history is what I'm worried about here. I think America's a noble nation. I think we've made mistakes. I think we tried to have freedom in Vietnam for the South Vietnamese. Unfortunately, the government was corrupt. I don't think that was a venal, terrible thing to do. I think we were trying to protect people there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.