One of her best outfits yet.
I think this meeting went very well.
So many great photos.
Everyone of them is AP. I guess it just needs to be assumed that is the default when it comes to FLOTUS pictures I guess.
Posted on 07/01/2017 7:36:49 AM PDT by KC_Lion
First Lady Melania Trump was pretty in pale pink as she and President Trump met with South Korea’s leaders at the White House Thursday.
Melania donned a $2,319 Roland Mouret pale, blush-toned sheath dress with her famous tousled hair, paired with nude-colored $675 Christian Louboutin stilettos, a favorite of the First Lady’s.
The Slovenian-born former model kept the ensemble paired-down, wearing only her wedding ring for jewelry and sporting natural shades of makeup.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I just love reading stories like this.
This sort of optimism in Global Politics is new for me in my life time.
One of her best outfits yet.
I think this meeting went very well.
So many great photos.
Everyone of them is AP. I guess it just needs to be assumed that is the default when it comes to FLOTUS pictures I guess.
She does look fantastic, but she would look fantastic if she were wearing noth...err...anything.
I just have to point out the “paired-down” phrase incorrectly used by the author. It’s excusable for regular folks posting on FR and such to get tripped up by Auto-Spell but it’s increasingly clear that alleged professionals either don’t know the difference or are too lazy to check their own work.
Thank you for pointing out what should have been” pared down.”
So called professionals are lax on editing.
It is morning in America again :)
Donald and the First Lady.
Just good to say It!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Pared down...that there is funny
15 carats at $3 million
Does John Binder, a paid journalist for Breitbart, not know the difference between “paired” and “pared”?
I’ll bet John refers to “the tenants of Christianity”, and confuses “reign” and “rein” often too.
No doubt he uses “loathe” when he should use “loath” also.
I’ve noticed she doesn’t wear much jewelry. After the crap that Moochelle wore all the time the newsies just have to keep mentioning that Melania doesn’t wear much.
Maybe they’d be happier if she put on a clown brooch occasionally. lol
Lol! I’ll bet you’re write!
Several times I’ve thought it be hilarious would be to pick out one of the most hideous Moochelle outfits (I’m talking about horse-blanket-with-boob-belt-and-clown-brooch) - and have Melania wear it to some public function. The media would rip her to shreds...and then the real fun would begin!
But she’s probably too nice a person to do it...
“No doubt he uses “loathe” when he should use “loath” also.”
As in a loath of bread?
That’s what I call a “precedent-president error”. Two words with very similar spellings and totally different meanings, an error not caught by spell check and often caused (LOL “caused” here was spelled “cased” until I caught it) by bad proof reading. A former boss of mine once entertained the office by writing a bogus memo loaded with every such error he could think of.
The more beautiful a woman is, the less reason to have jewelry on her. If she’s beautiful enough, even the most magnificent jewelry will reduce rather than enhance her appearance.
I respectfully disagree. I’ve seen beautiful women that look even more beautiful with amazing earrings, necklaces, etc.
The school principle says it’s a matter of principal.
If they ever run out of Pace-Makers just show the old guys a few pictures of Melania.
That will get their hearts pumping like they were 17 years old again!
Man, is this the best duty ever!
It is morning in American Again :D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.