The left is not a fan of humanity. That’s why.
"The logical import of Obamas vote against BAIPA [Born-Alive Infant Protection Act] is that he disagrees, i.e., once a baby has been targeted for abortion it thereafter has no inherent right to the food, comfort, and medical care provided to other babies born alive.
Indeed, during Illinois state senate deliberations on BAIPA, Obama stated that one of his objections was that the bill was designed to burden the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion. Apparently, once the decision to abort has been made, a child is doomed even if born alive."
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290764/clarifying-obamas-vote-born-alive-peter-kirsanow
*******************************************************************
1,270 Babies Born Alive After Failed Abortions in the U.S.
Steven Ertelt, Apr 5, 2013
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/04/05/1270-babies-born-alive-after-failed-abortions-in-the-united-states/
The agenda and reason for this all leads back to it’s ultimate source.
Let us not forget that the ruler of this world, who is pretty much in charge of the “world system” is Satan himself.
Satan hates human life passionately. We are made in the image of God and are deeply loved by Him. Therefore, Satan wants every single death he can achieve by any means possible.
This is first accomplished by separating us from God... Convincing mankind through the world system that there is no God. Then, once a majority of people are deceived in this (at least the ones in power), it is a very simple matter to take this belief (no God) to the most logical conclusion about what their duty is as rulers of the earth.
They call it agenda 21. It is the systematic reduction of the earth’s population in order to conserve resources...
Because if you don’t believe in a God Who provides, it is quite logical to view our environment as a very FINITE resource which must be carefully preserved by and for those who are most worthy of perpetuating the human race.
Otherwise, they see our fate as an overpopulated world which will self destruct from the over-consumption and lead to an untimely death for everyone.
Because babies generally get more attention than they do.
An interesting and slightly original thesis, but I’m not really buying it.
Leftists don’t care about babies because leftists are selfish and they are not babies.
This guy is somehow comparing modern college liberal elites to monastics, and not one word about the general acceptance of birth control within marriage. OK Pretty weird.
Freegards
Combine that with general evolutionary fear of overpopulation and you have quite an anti-most-baby attitude.
There is no Healthcare
There is only The Harvest.
Economics has to be part of the equation. In the times past, people depended on the family to care for them in their old age. After socialism took root, people began to believe daddy government would care for them. Why have so many children, especially since the high taxes needed to support the welfare state made it so expensive to have children? You also cannot overlook the fact that women have more options than they used to have.
Yes, the left generally seems to hate families, but there are more forces at work than just that.
Because they are death-worshiping monsters.
The right is anti abortion and pro death penalty.
The sane are anti abortion and the death penalty.
The left loves anchor babies. :-(
Because anti God and anti baby goes hand in hand.
When parents lose their rights to discipline their own children, where is the incentive to reproduce? Bottom line is that your kids are not just 'your kids' today. Most people don't believe in the 'village' as defined by government (even though many of them vote that way).
“Steve Sailer writes that women in Niger want about nine babies but usually have to make do with seven.”
A quick google search shows that childhood mortality rates there are pretty high, up over 25% only 20 years ago, and still around 10% nowadays. We’d be popping out more babies too if we knew a good number of them wouldn’t survive to be five or ten years old.
Academic: Someone who can not DO anything of value, speaks or writes a lot and expects to be paid to do so.
I was around when feminism got started. Those women ABSOLUTELY HATED MEN. Everything else stems from that.
Paul Ehrlich started a cult.
Interesting some of the world leaders are childless. Merkel, Teresa May, and Macron. There may be others.