Palin goes for the jugular in defamation lawsuit against the New York Times

AmericanThinker.com ^ | 7-27-2017 | Thomas Lifson

[Radix]

Your FR profile page is great as is your post here.

Thank You.

[lee martell]

Sarah has had years to think about how to respond. She knows how to keep a secret, as do the legal consultants working with her. Bring it on, Mrs. Palin!

[TWhiteBear]

When she wins, we can call it “Sarah Palin’s New York Times’.
I hope she puts more hunting and snowmobiling articles in.
TWB

[onyx]

Still the best!
Better than all the rest!

[heshtesh]

Especially the snowmobile articles! :)

[Jane Long]

Our Sarah does NOT bring a knife to a gunfight ;-)

Go get ‘em, dear Sarah.

[KC_Lion]

Just Like You Onyx! ((HUGS!!)

[God luvs America]

no settlement Sarah!!! make sure everything is out in the public!!! BRING THEM DOWN!!!

[onyx]

(((And *YOU* KC)))

[TangoLimaSierra]

I hope our Sarah ends up owning that fish wrap.
Just so she can shut it down.

Better yet, turn it into an honest reporter of the news.
Of course, the libs would think that was right-wing extremism anyway.

[onyx]

LOL.
She’s waited a long time.
She’s been very patient!

[NTHockey]

And if they leave out just ONE document, get them on obstruction of justice. Missing documents - look for gaps, missing responses, etc.

Bankrupt them; better yet, take over the NYT and make it Conservative.

[MrEdd]

It can’t work as a conservative paper because the dead tree news delivery is no longer economically viable.

Conservatives don’t pour buckets of money into inefficient money wasters just to own a propaganda device.

[fungoking]

The NY Times can see bankruptcy from their offices.

[Mariner]

It looks like Palin’s lawyers are driving toward a systematic, organizational conspiracy to libel and defame her.

She could end up owning the New York Times...except...

A judge somewhere will limit the scope of her discovery AND the suit/judgement under some convoluted interpretation of the First Amendment.

[Defiant]

She has a high burden of proving malice. It seems to me the courts have to allow her a lot of leeway to be able to prove the malice.

The Supremes need to revisit the huge loophole they gave the media to lie about public figures with near impunity. Malice is an addition to the constitution that is pure judge made law.

[DrDude]

Bookmark

[OldSmaj]

“Well...thank YOU”, he said, blushing shyly.

[A_Former_Democrat]

A great time to lower the stupid “actual malice” standard BS

And make the media start having a sense of responsibility and ethics

[MayflowerMadam]

“They should go back to 2008.”

Even farther. Go back to 2007. Remember the GOP Convention after she gave her speech — and the sh*t-storm the MSM began with 15 minutes after she finished? She scared the crap out of them, and they have been evil and brutal from that very night.