Posted on 08/07/2017 3:37:35 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
“Rosenstein and Sessions are going to talk us to death if they’re not careful.”
Yes, If bull$hit were music these two could be an orchestra!
Bol!
Hilarious!
Apparently never heard that the Supreme Court settled this back in 1971, New York Times Co. v. United States.
What about when the media informs you that your government has invaded a country that we never even declared war against, and that we’re dropping bombs on that country. Do you envision limits whatsoever on what the executive may declare a state secret, and thus keep from you?
The money is property that can be restored to its rightful owner. How do you presume this is in any way analogous to government censorship?
So what's your verdict? There can be no classified material?
The money is property that can be restored to its rightful owner. How do you presume this is in any way analogous to government censorship?
“The money is property that can be restored to its rightful owner.”
A top secret document is property of the U.S. government and can be stolen.
“How do you presume this is in any way analogous to government censorship?”
Top secret information is NOT government censorship.
The money analogy wasn’t mine. Respond to my post. I asked you a question. Can government classify material and create legal penalties for people who handle classified material?
People in power can try to create and keep all the secrets they want, but they can't muzzle the press to keep them. Supreme Court settled this very issue regarding the Pentagon Papers. Are you unaware of this?
Can government classify material and create legal penalties for people who handle classified material?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.