Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

Source?


18 posted on 08/09/2017 11:48:31 AM PDT by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Az Joe

This was a case where Sheriff Joe didn’t follow the instructions of the original
court case after it was decided. The Judge told him to cease and he didn’t. She
sentenced him to six months for not following court orders. He requested a jury
trial for this but was denied under AZ law.

I posted a couple links up thread which have some info on the event.


22 posted on 08/09/2017 12:10:15 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Az Joe
Source?

Among other things, the U.S. Supreme Court. The court has ruled on a number of occasions, most recently in a 1989 case Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas, that any criminal offense for which the maximum penalty is less than six months in prison is presumed to be a petty offense and the right of trial by jury guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment does not apply. Arizona has modified that slightly, in Derendal v. Phoenix City Prosecutors Office for example, so that misdemeanor charges that would have warranted a jury trial before Arizona became a state would still require a jury. All other misdemeanor cases would be handled as bench trials. Arpiao's charges were misdemeanors with a maximum penalty of less than six months. Under those circumstances he was not entitled to a jury trial.

23 posted on 08/09/2017 12:14:40 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson