Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Lee got rid of his wife’s slaves before the war started. Grant on the other hand had slaves and didn’t release them till after the war. When asked why he kept them so long he said “good help us hard to find.”


15 posted on 08/15/2017 8:05:38 PM PDT by NKP_Vet ("Man without God descends into madness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet

“Although he later served as a general in the Union Army, Grant had control of slaves owned by his wife.[1] He is known to have personally owned only one slave, William Jones, from 1857 to 1859.[2] Grant freed Jones rather than sell him, despite financial need.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_who_owned_slaves


19 posted on 08/15/2017 8:10:02 PM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary--REAL Russia-US collusion! (UraniumOne Deal, Missile Defense, Nukes) See my home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

The last of the G.W.P. Custis (Lee’s father in law) slaves were not freed by Lee until Dec 1862.


60 posted on 08/16/2017 3:44:49 AM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
Lee got rid of his wife’s slaves before the war started. Grant on the other hand had slaves and didn’t release them till after the war. When asked why he kept them so long he said “good help us hard to find.”

None of that is true.

63 posted on 08/16/2017 3:55:34 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson