Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Korea, U.S. to scrap warhead weight limit on South Korean missiles: Blue House
https://www.reuters.com/ ^ | SEPTEMBER 4, 2017 | Christine Kim

Posted on 09/04/2017 12:15:53 PM PDT by BBell

SEOUL (Reuters) - South Korean President Moon Jae-in and his U.S. counterpart Donald Trump agreed on Monday to scrap a warhead weight limit on South Korea’s missiles in the wake of North Korea’s sixth nuclear test, South Korea’s presidential office said.

In a separate phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin also on Monday, Moon said the U.N. Security Council should seek ways to sever North Korea’s foreign currency income, including from its workers employed abroad and oil shipments.

Under the existing missile pact between the United States and South Korea, Seoul’s warheads currently face a cap of 500 kg (1100 lb).

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bluehouse; missiles; southkorea; us; warhead; warheadweightlimit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Interesting.
1 posted on 09/04/2017 12:15:54 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BBell

I say the upper limit should be one or two megatons.


2 posted on 09/04/2017 12:19:25 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten
I say the upper limit should be one or two megatons.

What we really need to do is to quietly restart the micro-nuke project.

3 posted on 09/04/2017 12:22:14 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BBell

hmm, ... sounds like, soon they could be using the Daughter of the MOABs.


4 posted on 09/04/2017 12:22:51 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Making those missiles into bunker busters!


5 posted on 09/04/2017 12:28:37 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Did voting for Trump for President, make 62+ million of us into Deplorable Racists/Nazis? NO! NADA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Oops, could that measure make the peninsula “tip over?”


6 posted on 09/04/2017 12:39:30 PM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

So we have arms control treaties between us and our allies, particularly when one of them (South Korea) is still in a STATE OF WAR?

What the hell is wrong with us?


7 posted on 09/04/2017 12:40:24 PM PDT by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

I find it humliating there ever WAS an “upper limit”.

WHOSE feet are further in the fire, here, eh..?

We’d go NUTSO if the SK’s had to “authorize” us for more powerful stuff to, say, defend against MeHico.

We’d be super pissed.


8 posted on 09/04/2017 12:42:44 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

agree 10,000%

We have all manner of nano-tech that should be nuclear applicable.

There should even be tiny nuclear mortar rounds, grenades....

In fact it seems to me inevitable that there will one day be such things.


9 posted on 09/04/2017 12:45:06 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Back in the 80’s I was talking to a guy who was former Army Airborne. He told me that Special Forces had nuke land mines. One of their missions was to sneak into N. Korea, set the land mines to go off via a timer and get the heck out of there. The land mines were to be placed in areas where the resulting explosions could divert the flow of rivers and streams so that they would flood the NORK’s tunnel complexes. I don’t know whether this was pure bunk or not but anything is plausible.


10 posted on 09/04/2017 12:47:15 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I’d even like to see tiny little nuclear firecrackers, for the Fourth of July.


11 posted on 09/04/2017 12:47:42 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Was war ever declared?


12 posted on 09/04/2017 12:48:16 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
VERY small amount of Plutonium required


13 posted on 09/04/2017 12:49:20 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
Headline:

"American President Donald J. trump starts nuclear war!"

14 posted on 09/04/2017 12:50:22 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BBell

South Korea has had 60+ years to take care of their problem with their northern cousins.

We need to walk out of there and let South Korea handle their own affairs.


15 posted on 09/04/2017 12:51:24 PM PDT by CodeToad (Victorious warriors WIN first, then go to war! Go TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell
A nuke, yup! The "Davey Crokett".

If this was available in 1950, where is the tech NOW..?

Yield of 10-20 tons of TNT, or 0.01-0.02 kilotons 1,500 of them and you'd have Hiroshima, or thereabouts

16 posted on 09/04/2017 12:54:52 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Where is the list of countries doing business with North Korea?


17 posted on 09/04/2017 12:56:04 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

The engineers had back pack or suit case type nukes to forestall a Russian Tank invasion in the gap in Europe in the early 60s so this is not far fetched.


18 posted on 09/04/2017 12:56:39 PM PDT by Mouton (The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

19 posted on 09/04/2017 12:58:31 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

As far as I know the war never ended, just a cease fire in 1954. No peace treaty or formal end to hostilities...the main reason that border is so damn tense, and scary.


20 posted on 09/04/2017 12:59:54 PM PDT by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson